Not necessarily. That is my fault for being imprecise in my language. For social contracts, I'm speaking in the Lockean or Rousseauian sense. For some background, you can find information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract
I do want to point out that I'm not trying to make a moral argument that you and your lifestyle are bad.
Subsidies are both direct and indirect, and they touch on fiscal policy, city planning, tax incentives, history, and a variety of other factors. I won't take up a large amount of space in this thread writing out what others have studied and spoken about more eloquently. I would direct you here: https://www.citylab.com/equity/2015/03/how-much-sprawl-costs-america/388481/ for a quick primer on what I am discussing.