Jump to content

DanLarsen34

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    514

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by DanLarsen34

  1. DanLarsen34
    .
  2. DanLarsen34
    This is worth noting. .
  3. DanLarsen34
    This might be the biggest outbreak of the year when all is set and done, with several strong/intense tornadoes. .
  4. DanLarsen34
    I had this same thought. We used to get PDS watches virtually every moderate risk day, but that doesn’t seem to be the case anymore. Seems odd not to have gone with PDS language given the high-end environment in place. .
  5. DanLarsen34
    One of the craziest tornado videos you’ll ever see. .
  6. DanLarsen34
    .
  7. DanLarsen34
    This may very well have been a violent tornado. The motion in this clip from Reed Timmer is insane. .
  8. DanLarsen34
    This storm is behaving a lot like the Wynnewood storm did several years ago. Think we’re about to see a cycle on it too.
  9. DanLarsen34
    .
  10. DanLarsen34
    I’m seeing mixed evidence of a tornado on Twitter skimming videos. It’s been really difficult to tell if this thing is on the ground too because of the distance it is from both radars.
  11. DanLarsen34
  12. DanLarsen34
  13. DanLarsen34
    Cell to the south near Palmer, IA looks like it’s about to go nuts
  14. DanLarsen34
  15. DanLarsen34
  16. DanLarsen34
    Not comparing these two setups when I say this, but I believe we had a similar issue in modeling in the the build-up to 4-14-2012 where some models were initiating no convection align the dry line despite minimal capping.
  17. DanLarsen34
    This is worth noting.
  18. DanLarsen34
    The signal for discrete/semi-discrete cells is there for the southern end of the line.
  19. DanLarsen34
    Why on earth was the Round Rock storm not warned until now? It might have produced a major tornado.
  20. DanLarsen34
  21. DanLarsen34
    This is a really good thread. I didn’t know about this quote from the Vilonia survey until now.
  22. DanLarsen34
  23. DanLarsen34
  24. DanLarsen34
    Counterpoint to our discussion here that really hits at a major problem.
  25. DanLarsen34
    This is shocking. If Jarrell is the standard we are now using to judge EF-5 ratings, we may literally never see an EF-5 rating again. Jarrell caused arguably the most complete destruction we’ve ever seen.
×
×
  • Create New...