Jump to content

Greg

Members
  • Posts

    2,043
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Greg

  1. I agree with your statement. I think some of the ratios will be mostly (10:1 - 13:1) in the majority of this storm. Maybe someone a decent distance away with good elevation might be 15:1 but that would be the minority in this situation.
  2. Still out to hour 37 on NAM 3K. (Tues 01 Z) Looking good for Eastern/Southeastern MA.
  3. Quantity definately better over Eastern and Southeastern MA this run. A squeeze play is taking place here now with these models.
  4. Dam that high over Minnesota is really trying to barrel in to create more confluence/Jet streak to the north and suppress this. Go away and please keep your distance away from us please. Help funneling in the cold but stay away.
  5. The reason it does tht is because the upper level low is capturing it and hooking it back twards the coastline. The is the so-called loop.
  6. 12Z NAM taking shape now. Let's see if it holds its ground.
  7. That's fine, there's nothing wrong about that. It will be pretty accurate.
  8. Not sure I have the so-called protective areas, but I do get your point. I do feel it can still be done though with fairly decent accuracy. But winds and drifting do indeed make storms like this on the tougher side to measure things normally.
  9. Definitely be a top 10, but top 5 would have to really be a direct hit. Especially if that mega band sets up perfectly.
  10. Nah, it's still possible to get a pretty accurate measurement with these. Just measure in multiple places around the house if you can. Make sure your about 20 feet away from the house though while taking these measurements so the roof snow doesn't add in with the snowfall. Also try to get a nice round number of how much snow you have already have on the ground so you can subtracted this from the snowfall, it will add to the settled total snow depth. It can be done.
  11. I'd say a line more from Putnum, CT through North Foster, RI, Mansfield, MA over to Brokton, MA will probably be the Jacks with this at about 30". Just a humble guess given the trajectory right now. I don't think 36" falls from this storm though. That's a little too high but with the snow already on the ground in many places already, people may actually record that number as total Snow Depth for a decent part of the forecasting area.
  12. Same here. 6-8"most places then about 8-10" in shady areas. Interesting displacement of the snow still on the ground.
  13. Sure, that's upper level low about to help draw in the main system that will form down off the Carolinas, but I just generally start counting specifically when the ocean storm itself starts to hit us. To me it just seems more legit to start counting then instead of these little disturbances/ flurries that pass now and again. That's all really IMHO.
  14. That was left over snow from system we just had. The Storm hasn't formed yet. It's just starting to barely take shape now.
  15. That's absolutely ridiculous! That stuff isn't happening. I have a funny feeling now that these mesos are going a little too crazy right now. These solutions are a little unrealistic that are being printed out now. This will be very interesting how this storm truly evolves and how it really ends ground in truth observations.
  16. Definitely a further northward tug. I can tell right away.
  17. It did a loop off the mid-Atlantic but hugs the coast somewhat. Recovered nicely.
  18. Remember to measure it about 20' from one's house so roof snow won't count in the total amount/accumulation. Check the snow depth on the ground before the storm starts. Just subtract that amount from whatever storm total one gets as a final. It should be fairly accurate to the best of one's ability.
  19. The origianal Coops data has it. It is in faded marker but one can read it if magnified a bit.
  20. The old-fashioned way. Take several measurements around the yard (Best ability one can) and average them together. It will at least be a good round total instead of nothing.
  21. Nothing special? East Springfield got 22.5" (Pumping Station), 19" in Holyoke, 20.5" in Chicopee. This was outside of the down sloping/shadow effect of the River Valley. Those numbers were recorded by Coops back then. They are pretty solid.
  22. Not sure that was truly an all-timer there. There were discrepancies in amounts down there.
×
×
  • Create New...