Jump to content

MountainGeek

Members
  • Posts

    478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MountainGeek

  1. 6 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

    Super :weenie: look on the GEPS. Seems biggest variability in the ensembles over the last couple days is in the Aleutian low and associated EPO and PNA domains. Yesterday’s 12z EPS looked a lot like that GEPS plot, then it weakened the ridging in the west coast and NAO region overnight. But even in a weakened state, the looks are still good. They’re varying between “solid/decent” and “pants tent”, which is a pretty good regime to be in. I wish it was December...

    Yeah I really would like to know whether Nov is merely a "head fake" before we torch through half our prime climo in Dec/Jan, or a glimpse into perhaps the base state setting up for winter. Guess we'll find out in a few weeks......

  2. 5 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

    GEFS/GEPS both pop an -EPO last week of the month. GEPS signal is so strong it's a closed ridge at 16 day leads... lol. Wut?

     

    We're seeing a lot of absolute primo upper level panels for a coastal storm lately. They keep getting better too. I said a bunch of times back during the 13-15 stretch about how I would like to see what would happen with a nasty -EPO and -NAO. heh. Might find out...:weenie:

    IMO seeing coastals pop up is a good thing regardless since it means there's a chance this winter pattern might feature at least some favorable periods.

    All for a nasty -EPO and -NAO as long as it's not overdone to the point where we're getting suppression. I'll be thrilled to see our SE friends cash in on Miller A's that start in AL as long as they eventually get around to mauling us. But I'll take a pass on smoking cold cirrus while watching Atlanta get hammered by a southern slider. :weenie: 

    • Like 1
  3. 9 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

     

    Wow -- incredible amount of information and very informative with lots of detail and explanation as to what's going on.

    I found this section re NAO prediction fascinating -- and quite an interesting history lesson re the contributions of @UniversesBelowNormal:

     

    Utilizing North Atlantic SSTs During Summer as an NAO Predictor for Cold Season
    Perhaps one of the most skilled forecasters on a forum replete with talented meteorologists
      and hobbyists alike, in americanwx.com, "StormchaserChuck", now known as 
    "UniversesBelowNormal", devised a formula over a decade ago that predicts the mean
     aggregate state of the NAO for the ensuing winter using the SSTs in an area of the north
     Atlantic. This methodology is strongly endorsed as one of the more accurate predictors
     available for the mean state of the winter NAO. In fact, had Eastern Mass Weather
     considered it last season, the outlook would have been much more successful.
    The following methodology is a wonderful illustration of the delayed feedback between sea
     and air that represents the very essence of the elaborate system of atmospheric oscillations
     that is so often referenced.
     
    "In 2006 on a site called easternuswx, elaborate research was done with North Atlantic SSTs,
     showing high lagging predictive value for following Winter's NAO/AO. The correlation factor
     was higher than 0.4, and there was advantage over decadal cycles. Meaning, it would
     predict years that reversed the decadal trend. The index was very accurate in predicting
     the +NAO for the 2006-2007 Winter, and got much attention after a topic called "This
     will be the warmest Winter on record for the US" (It was the 7th warmest).  Since then
     the index has performed wonderfully after the fact:
     
    2018-19: +NAO signal/+NAO winter....Verified
    2017-18: Strong -NAO signal/+NAO Winter....Failure to Verify
    2016-17: Strong - NAO signal/ Weak -NAO Winter  .. Verified
    2015-16: +NAO signal/ +NAO Winter ... Verified
    2014-15: Strong - NAO signal / +NAO Winter ... Failure to Verify
    2013-14: Strong +NAO signal / +NAO Winter ... Verified
    2012-13: slight -NAO signal / strong -NAO Winter ... Verified
    2011-2012 neutral NAO signal / +NAO Winter ... Null
    2010-2011: Strong -NAO signal/ Strong -NAO Winter ... Verified
    2009-2010: Strong -NAO signal / Strong - NAO Winter ... Verified
    2008-2009: weak -NAO signal / weak -NAO Winter ... Verified
    2007-2008: -NAO signal / +NAO Winter ... Failure to Verify
    2006-2007: +NAO signal / weak +NAO Winter ... Verified
    2005-2006: strong +NAO signal / +NAO Winter ... Verified
     
    In fact, the predictor has now verified 10 times, failed 3 times and predicted a neutral ENSO
     once. The value of this predictor as a forecasting tool has proven high, although the
     scientific fundamentals are a bit weaker in in the opinion of this writer. The index is a
     measurement of May 1 - Sept 30 SSTs in the North Atlantic. It's correlated to following
     November-March NAO/AO (+6 month lag). The index is a composite of 2 areas in the
     North Atlantic (blue box - red box). When blue box is cold SSTs, negative NAO Winter.
     When red box in warm SSTs, negative NAO Winter. For compare, and red box is 65%
     value of blue box anomaly (so -1 blue +0.65 red is same thing). Visa versa.
     The index this year is indicative of a moderately robust -NAO, at -.55 to -.60, as per
     the north atlantic SSTS between May and September:
    • Thanks 1
  4. 18 hours ago, frd said:

    Not to jinx us, but love seeing the orientation of the PV combined with the location and from there tons of snow will be put down just to our NW and a breeding ground for some very cold air delivery, eventually a direct discharge. 

    We did not have this last year. Also, it seems the atmosphere, at least so far, is conducive to showing ( and delivering ) a good pattern. 

    Hopefully any turn to the milder later in November is just a reload, or a brief moderation.  Still like a normal December with snowfall opportunities.  

     

    Also I like seeing as much early cold as we can over the GL region.....the quicker we can get the lakes cooled down and partially frozen, the less moderating effect they have on the cold shots coming down from Canada. Since so many of our events have at least a portion of the subforum flirting with the freezing line, every degree matters.

    • Like 1
  5. 19 hours ago, frd said:

    If you believe the notion that this will be a back loaded winter, combined

    with a  possibly colder and more active November leads me to think this March will have higher odds of snow and cold. With the exception of last March,  we have trended to winters lasting longer, and starting later in this decade.

    .................

    Granted October 2009  was much colder , then November turned warmer in time 

     

     

    Yeah I never count March out -- it can be a lot of fun sometimes if things line up just right. In a couple of the "bad" years, our best storm of the season was mid or late-March. 

    It will be interesting to see if there's any similarity to 2009 this time around, one obvious difference is the Oct cold in 2009 seemed much more widespread and this year it was cold west/warm east. 

  6. 40 minutes ago, rclab said:

    I like your explanation. Sadly it makes picking the correct 5 + 1 for mega and power ball look easy. As always ......

    Thanks -- don't forget to mix in general atmospheric chaos/butterfly effect, a VERY short recorded data timespan (relative to all of past history).....trying to predict longer term and seasonal weather has lot of parallels to picking numbers or trying to "game" a slot machine. Quite a few of the folks who participate in this forum enjoy hitting the casino as well...I don't think that's a coincidence. And the nice thing about weather is when it pulls the rug out from under you, you only suffer a hit to your pride and not your pocketbook. :D

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
  7. 3 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

    Again which begs the question...will the benefits lag until NEXT winter...or will we already feel them this year?...

    Depends on the lag duration....on the positive side: solar was very low last year as well so if there's, say, a 1 year lag, we're getting any benefits now and next winter might get even more "help" in that area. If there's not a lag, then we're getting any benefits as we go in real time. All good, right? 

    But remember it's never only one factor -- the ultimate winter outcome is a combination of dozens of known factors (and maybe even more that we still don't fully understand yet). And of course the possible links between low solar, HL blocking, colder winters, etc are still being explored, so no guarantees. ;)

    • Like 2
  8. 10 minutes ago, losetoa6 said:

    Saw that. And many Eps members showing pretty strong ( esp this time of year ) sprawling highs penetrating the Conus day 9 -10 . 

    We got 5 or 6 inches last year on Nov 15, maybe an early start again for this season?

    Would be really nice to get a little appetizer on the board up front, say a couple inches or even some mood flakes. The years where we're completely shutout with torches or "no chance" patterns until late Feb or March are the worst......

    • Like 1
  9. 2 hours ago, WxUSAF said:

    I think it’s more that long range ensembles typically show a pattern washed out in space and time, where there’s typically more variability, especially in winter, due to storm systems that aren’t seen in long range ensemble means. As you get closer, the ensembles resolve that variability. For example, next week still looks BN overall, but it was looking like wall-to-wall cold a couple days ago. Now you’re seeing the ensembles pick up on a brief warming around next Wednesday due to SW flow ahead of the next cold front.

    That said, the gfs and GEFS definitely have a cold bias in the long range, and there’s also a tendency to overdo HL blocking. 

    I’m buying the cold look more right now because the Eps is very bullish on cross polar flow.

    Ah yes, good point that the ensemble washout wouldn't "see" brief warming periods related to return flow, etc....which then start to factor back in closer in time and moderate the original extreme.

    I think your approach of analyzing the background state and other supporting factors (or lack of)....like the cross-polar flow you mentioned.....is a smart way to evaluate whether the LR might be on to something or if it is just out to lunch (or trying to lure weenies into early reapings). 

     

  10. 3 hours ago, WxUSAF said:

    Certainly a very cold look for next weekend on the ensembles. I’d wait until this weekend before being comfortable with how cold that ends up. Colder looks in the long range tend to modify with time.

    Would it be reasonable to say that, more often than not, most LR modeled extremes (hot, cold, HL blocking, etc) tend to moderate somewhat as we get closer in time? That has been my general experience. I figure it has something to do with compounding of modeled errors out in time creating a tendency to overdo things a bit.....

  11. Interesting thoughts from Cranky on the upcoming winter:

    http://www.stormhamster.com/entry2/e101819.htm

    1018-029.jpg

    Something you've seen me post since the summer and the process continues to reinforce. We just watched two October storm setups born off this very pattern being emulated by our stream flows. We'll watch the next attempt to do the same.

    Does this persist into winter? If so I continue to say we could see several more classic arctic outbreaks and classic coastal winter storm tracks.

    I am not talking about a ceaseless onslaught. The overall winter pattern in my opinion likely features the blander milder November, a colder active December, then January/February maybe a little above norms, with March/April possibly featuring another late period colder/active return.

    Yet within all of that? Expect a few more classic outbreaks and storm tracks.

    Of course, it is still early, and it will be another 4 to 8 weeks before we truly know if the support we see now is still in play by then.

  12. 3 hours ago, WxUSAF said:

    Ukie cancels winter

     

    Got any verification scores for handy for that model? 

    Also early on last year it seems like almost every model in the LR seemed to be predicting a big -NAO that just kept sliding out into the future and never actually materialized. Maybe we'll play opposite again this year to our advantage. 

  13. Wow -- just checked in to see if the winter discussions are starting, and was pleased to find quite a lot of solid technical discussion and good data points! Here's to hoping we can keep this "quality post" trend going...and looking forward to another fun winter tracking season. 

    Pleassseeee just once -- it's time we had a low solar + Modoki + neg NAO + warm blob epic winter. :weenie:

    On a more serious note, I'm liking what appears to be a more favorable PAC shaping up, since the PAC really hurt us several times last year. 

    • Like 2
  14. 11 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

    Can’t remember the exact year of the last one..want to say 1998

    Not the most recent one, but per: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2014/04/03/you-wont-believe-how-late-it-snowed-in-d-c-in-colonial-times/?utm_term=.bfbf413844f7

    • The Great April Fools Day Storm of 1807. From the Ohio Valley to the northern mid-Atlantic, anywhere from 1-4 feet of snow accumulated, with the higher amounts, of course, in central Pennsylvania, New York, and New England.
    • April 5, 1863 recorded 12 inches of snow in Georgetown, Washington, D.C.
    • DC's latest measurable snow was on April 28, 1898, when .5 inches fell. 
    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...