Jump to content

MountainGeek

Members
  • Posts

    478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MountainGeek

  1. 1961-1969:

     

     

    image.thumb.png.1c20e10edf2f743740388ead35395a07.png

     

    Both decades had 63 storms within the search criteria - 750 miles of ATL (arbitrary, but picked to try to filter storms that didn't significantly impact GOM or W ATL ). 

    The 1960s seem to have a higher number of high-intensity storms in GOM, whereas 1950s have more in the W ATL/eastern seaboard. 

    Of course, this could all be backwards and hurricane intensity is just another effect of other pattern drivers rather than cause.....

     

    • Like 1
  2. @psuhoffman - have you ever looked into potential correlation between ACE (especially in GOM and eastern seaboard), # of CONUS landfalling hurricanes, and the following winters? Obviously there's a ton of factors all mixed in that create a given winter "state", but just curious if we have a very mild hurricane season, how much heat energy does NOT get dissipated in the summer/fall and then rolls into GOM/Western ATL SSTs, tending to feed SER and WAR. Overall ACE could be misleading as well, since I'd think a GOM hurricane would have a lot more effect than something hitting Bermuda and hooking back east. 

  3. 20 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

    Subsurface in Nino 4 is about 10F above normal.. 65 degrees, not 55 degrees. I've found that the subsurface is more important regards to actual N. Pacific pattern in 0-time (D+0). 

    Untitled.png.caa496e27ed75f3a23434633c11ab709.png

    (You can also look at the pressure pattern that happened in Winter 87-88, in reverse, when the subsurface was total cold (<-5F) During El Nino (SouthUS-High Pressure)(as the best analog match).)

    TRANSLATION for @Solution Man: Chuck believes that subsurface ENSO temps are more correlated to the real-time N. Pacific pattern vs surface temps (which tend to lag). So when subsurface is on fire (Jan 18), the real time response would be an El Nino NPAC result.  Hence the super-nino pattern in California.

    • Like 3
  4. 40 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

    Most of the area got 3-5” from that storm…places north or east of Baltimore more like 4-8. 

    Yes -- I'm definitely not trying to deb on our chances..would love to see us do well on this one. The linked site had somewhat of a NC/VA focus (so I'm guessing they got nothing down there from that storm).... but it had decent graphics showing the various synoptic setups since apparently Miller is the word of the day...

  5. 4 minutes ago, LeesburgWx said:

    All this talk about Miller A vs B. Isn’t there also a Miller C? Perhaps this fits that classification? 

    For those who want to learn more about Miller setups (and yes, there are hybrids/variants): 

    https://glenallenweather.com/alink/18snow/stormtypes.htm

    Miller A type snowstorm

    This type of snowstorm has a low which originates in the Gulf; it intensifies and races up the east coast. EX: Superstorm 1993, Blizzard of 1996. These tend to be more widespread in area BUT can be less favorable for historic snows in New England. However, they can clobber portions of the Mid-Atlantic.
     

    Miller B type snowstorm

    This type snowstorm has a primary low over the Appalachians while a new, secondary, and more powerful low spins up along the Gulf Stream waters off the coast of NC. It intensifies and depending on its track can clobber areas of inland or coastal New England. These are less widespread in terms of area and usually miss the Mid-Atlantic. EX: Blizzard of 2005.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...