Jump to content

snowmagnet

Members
  • Posts

    962
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by snowmagnet

  1. 2 hours ago, psuhoffman said:

    What is going on. For the last 3 months I’ve been taking abuse for being a deb because I wasn’t interested in day 10 fantasy and was saying nope sorry that’s not gonna happen. 
     

    Now I’m optimistic we might have a chance and those same people are being huge debs. WTF. 

    I’m very excited about your optimism!  You’ve been right all winter, unfortunately. So there is only one way to go from here! 

  2. 3 minutes ago, Buddy1987 said:

    I will believe this sh*t when I see it down this way falling and on the ground. Anything to do with 850s and having to wet bulb just screams don't get invested. 

    It’s all part of the game. We win rarely and lose usually, but that’s risk in tracking.  For me the most frustrating ones are when the tracking goes well for days and days leading up to the event, only to end up as too warm, too dry, or too far south.   Some of the most interesting storms are those that thread the needle or rely on deformation. 

  3. 5 minutes ago, 87storms said:

    Blurb from LWX on that one...

    Come Saturday, the trough/vortex will move into Maritime Canada with
    height rises locally. As an incoming trough moves through the Ohio
    Valley, the interaction of the northern and southern stream energy
    will be key to see if there is any precipitation/storm threat Sunday
    into Monday. Have maintained low end chance POPs for most with some
    wintry potential.

    Most positive post so far today! 

    • Like 3
  4. 23 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

    Too early for that. Next 10 days look absolutely abysmal at first but moderates towards just run of the mill God awful. Trend is our friend. Maybe we can move firmly into the not terrible enough to not snow arena before it's still light after 7pm :tomato:

    I appreciate when you pop on here to keep people from jumping off the ledge.  I don't think the models can handle things in the long run, especially when the Pac is throwing a wrench in things.  We have seen this all winter.  This current pattern can't last, so something has to give.  Or maybe it will and California will be under water much earlier than predicted.  

  5. 12 minutes ago, CAPE said:

    It does happen. Last Jan was an example, but the main difference is the cold coming in was legit and sharp. Even though temps were 60 leading in, it started off as snow and much of it fell with temps in the low to mid 20s. The way this pattern seems to be evolving on the means, it looks like more of a gradual transition to somewhat colder. That doesn't mean we can't get a similar result.

    At least there is something to track.  I think that's what everyone here needs most of all.  I'm hopeful that we will luck out with something by mid-January! 

     

    • Like 1
  6. 1 hour ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

    Who wouldn't take this fantasy look in early January? If we didn't know it was going to push mid 60s a few days prior we would be more inclined to believe it:

    We often get good storms within a couple of days of really warm temperatures.  Most recently that happened last January, but it is pretty common around here.  I'm always hearing people say, "its too warm to snow", or "it won't stick" when we are predicting a coastal storm 2 days after it hits 60 or 70. I could be wrong, but I seem to recall it was pretty warm just a couple days before Jan '16 too.  

×
×
  • Create New...