Jump to content

bubba hotep

Members
  • Posts

    2,665
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bubba hotep

  1. 30 minutes ago, bubba hotep said:

    This band is looking decent, the graupel could be an indication that instability is increasing as the base of the trough swings through. We officially have a dusting at my place. 

    C1gsKRMXUAIiv60.jpg

    487 
    FXUS64 KFWD 061955
    AFDFWD
    
    Area Forecast Discussion
    National Weather Service Fort Worth TX
    145 PM CST Fri Jan 6 2017
    
    .MESOSCALE UPDATE...
    Clear case of CSI enhanced snowfall occurring over the northern half
    of the DFW metroplex with radar showing the classic banded
    appearance. The enhanced instability across the DFW area is forecast
    to rapidly diminish and shift eastward by 3 pm, but these bands are
    going to drop near a quarter inch of accumulating snowfall across
    the northern half of the DFW Metroplex and into Hunt and Hopkins
    counties and have updated the forecast to reflect that.  So far
    impacts from this snow have been minimal in the DFW area, as cold
    pavement temperatures are allowing the light fluffy snow to blow to
    the sides of the street. With the increasing stability and
    decreasing moisture in the snow production layer, the intensity of
    this snow will wane to just flurries over the DFW area and end
    altogether by mid-late afternoon. TR.92
  2. 902 
    FXUS64 KFWD 061745
    AFDFWD
    
    Area Forecast Discussion
    National Weather Service Fort Worth TX
    1145 AM CST Fri Jan 6 2017
    
    .MESOSCALE UPDATE...
    This section is a technical discussion of the dynamics for winter
    precipitation to point out the features we are watching closely
    through the afternoon. The forecast remains on track. See
    earlier update for that type of forecast information.
    
    Precipitation is continuing north of I-20 as the upper level
    shortwave trough approaches. This is causing frontogenetical lift
    to increase near 700 mb which is the critical layer for
    precipitation in this event. Parcels lifted near 700 mb are in a
    region characterized by weak convective instability (CI) or
    conditional symmetric instability (CSI) as depicted by EPV*
    charts. The strongest frontogenesis at 700 mb coincides very well
    with the location of a band of heavier snow from roughly Lawton,
    OK to Hobbs, NM. This band is tracking southeast, along with the
    best frontogenesis forcing, and therefore we can use 700 mb
    frontogenesis forecasts as a proxy for the location of heavier
    snows.
    
    While a radar loop would imply that this band will be tracking
    through North Texas around mid afternoon, there a couple of
    factors that will cause this precipitation to weaken. The first
    being that all models forecast the frontogenetical lift at 700 mb
    will begin to weaken by mid to late afternoon. The second more
    important reason is that rapid drying is forecast to occur near
    and above 700 mb around 2 or 3 pm from west to east over North
    Texas. This will obviously limit the moisture for significant
    precipitation but it will also result in increasing stability
    aloft that will end potential for CI/CSI. We should see the impact
    of this dry air with radar echoes clearing out rapidly from west
    to east across the CWA between 2 pm and 5 pm.
    
    If we don't start seeing an erosion of these echoes by 3 pm in
    our western counties, it will be because the models likely have
    miss-diagnosed the amount of dry air. This would result in
    slightly higher amounts of snow along and north of I-20, but even
    in this case we're talking only a half inch more than currently
    forecast. 
    
    TR.92
  3. 5 minutes ago, Captmorg70 said:

    Yea I agree they may be a bit conservative. Though this setup seems rather tricky. It seems that it really comes down to how much moisture is there when we have better forcing and how quickly it dries out. I kinda miss the storms where we're worried about the cold instead... :lol:

    Last year was obviously a massive bust but the last few years prior we always seemed to have at least one system that wasn't supposed to do anything turn out to be an 1" or more. I remember one that ended up being thunder snow and nearly 2", forecast the night before was for cold and cloudy. 

  4. 1 hour ago, aggiegeog said:

    We are looking at three winter precip areas tomorrow in Texas.

    First one is trending north towards the I40 in OK and the Panhandle. It looks to produce around 6" in the Panhandle and a couple inches as you move into eastern OK. This could still trend back south towards the Red River, but I don't see much of this falling in N TX. This event is mainly early tomorrow.  

    Second area falls tomorrow afternoon into tomorrow evening. It looks to spread flurries to a dusting over N and E TX. Areas along I-30 in the NE TX could see up to a couple inches though as there is more moisture there. 

    The third area is associated to the Gulf low which may throw some moisture into sub freezing air in inland SE TX in the form of sleet and maybe freezing rain late tomorrow. 

    One trend in N. Texas this past week or so has been for the models to be too dry in the lower levels. Does that hold for tomorrow? 

  5. 6 hours ago, raindancewx said:

    After the massive spike in November, the PDO has weakened quite a bit in December according to NOAA. Will be good seeing the JISAO value in a few weeks.

    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/teleconnections/pdo/

    Expecting the AMO to drop too, not a whole lot of months like Nov 2016 where it reached >=0.400

    https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/amon.us.long.data

    I prefer the JISAO data and see it widely used, honestly, I rarely see anyone use the NOAA numbers for PDO. It's not surprising that this La Nina event failed given how warm the overall Pacific was. I don't think there were any analogs with a strongly positive PDO and a medium/strong La Nina. However, the atmospheric response has certainly been more ninaish than I expected given the weak and short lived look. MEI rose from -0.379 to -0.212 and the corresponding '98 numbers were -0.973 and -1.05. Hopefully, this a sign that a wetter Spring might set in.   

  6. 3 hours ago, Quixotic1 said:

    Well, if it ain't us, I hope it's somewhere near by or further south.  I'm really jonesing for flakes though. 

    IMBY or bust! We've scored on some of these marginal setups in the recent past. I still think we'll see plenty of model shifting, with two of the main players still several days away. It's just that the shifting will probably be between nothing and maybe an inch, not a lot of room :lol:

  7. Looks like the 1st watch will snag Ft. Worth but Dallas and areas east of I35 will have to wait until later:

    C1I1HiZWQAAGgky.jpg

    Mesoscale Discussion 0002
       NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
       1011 PM CST Sun Jan 01 2017
    
       Areas affected...Much of Central Texas
    
       Concerning...Severe potential...Watch possible 
    
       Valid 020411Z - 020645Z
    
       Probability of Watch Issuance...60 percent
    
       SUMMARY...Thunderstorms will increase in coverage and intensity
       later tonight, with damaging winds and hail expected. A watch may be
       needed prior to 06Z.
    
       DISCUSSION...A rapidly moving cold front continues to move eastward
       across West TX, with several wind gusts in excess of 40-50 kts
       measured and only sporadic lightning. This front will gradually
       interact with an increasingly unstable air mass, still well to the
       east as of 04Z. However, increasing flow in the low levels just
       above the surface will help transport mid to upper 50s dewpoints
       northward out of South TX, with a rapid uptick in storms along the
       front expected as MUCAPE of 500-1000 j/kg develops. This in turn
       should allow for a line of storms along the front, with both wind
       and hail possible.
    
       ..Jewell/Hart.. 01/02/2017
×
×
  • Create New...