I really hope that at some point we get a postmortem on what happened to the radar at Paducah. If there's physical damage that took Paducah down -- fine, that's going to happen sometimes. But what I find inexcusable is that many meteorologists, especially public facing meteorologists doing newscasts, failed to recognize that it was serving old data and subsequently gave many timelines that were off by like 10 minutes.
My point is this: it's not their fault that they didn't recognize this when they're busy with running a newscast. The problem is structural in the protocols and tools that are used to distribute this data. If a data source goes down, it needs to not publish old data as if it's new, and there need to be big warning signs in all the tools that you're looking at old data. It should never happen that a meteorologist is telling people that the tornado will be there in 10 minutes when in reality it's already over the city.
But that happened last night. And it's a huge failure.
I think this issue, which is fundamentally a software issue in my mind, probably cost at least one person their life.