Jump to content

LakeEffectKing

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    4,475
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LakeEffectKing

  1. I think, with decent ratios, someone in S. Oswego Co. or N. Onondaga Co. will see 8"+ overnight.
  2. Not strong, yet...but certainly some seeding, and maybe a bit of the remnant vertical circulation. If it does make a strong connection it will become oriented a little bit more WNW as opposed to due West along the South shore. Either way, I think you and Brian are in pretty good shape...but it will be pretty narrow.
  3. Well, the issue (post mortem) was 2 fold. I think it is just difficult for the models to handle slp placement when upper levels support an slp on top of the mountains...then/if models do resolve the correct lp placement (in this case to the west) they seem to way underdo the warm air advection. All IMO, of course.
  4. For as long as I can remember, models underestimate the warmth thrown northward (at many levels) when systems are west of the apps....and it happens alot, but this was extreme!
  5. You are not alone my friend. This was a case where we witnessed models weaknesses....
  6. Started in Caz..pretty steady considering the returns over me....1.5" during day today. Temp at 22 currently.
  7. If the WSI precipitation type radar Is to be believed, then the majority of the models have been too far Northwest with the snow sleet line all day long. I think the pingers stay south..models, imo, are having a tough time with the cold air at the low-levels with the track of this system.....
  8. Just something to keep track of as we go into the evening. It may have something to do with the atmospheric set up down there that is throwing the models off with the algorithms... Not sure..
  9. Again, GFS initializes sn/ip line wrong. 12z GFS at 18z: Current radar:
  10. Based on viewing some upstream data, I feel somewhat confident that the models will tic back southeast with the snow/sleet line for late tonight...fingers crossed!
×
×
  • Create New...