I still say at the end of the day, we should be able to muster enough n stream insert for a good foot of snowfall, given the -NAO/PNA tandem. I can't imagine the well is that dry with the PAC that active.
We will know by 12z tmw.
Difference is that was a track issue. This is track and occlusion...my concern is more the latter.
The Dec system was occluding, albeit at a much slower rate because it had better SW mechanics.
I think we are both in the same boat for diff reasons...NYC has shot at the first load, while we do not. We have a shot at the secondary hook-redevelopment, and they do not.
Only high confidence crush is a portion of the mid atl.
I am more open minded with this one than I normally am with Miller Bs because the S stream is involved and we see that LBSW. All bets are off with that.
I can't stand when the mid atl gets crushed because the question that immediately follows is how will that limit SNE snow.....bc 9.9/ ten times it will.
I'm all for giving credit where its due, but I just feel like that is dumb 4 days out in a fairly fluid situation.
NYC gets creamed, and Boston gets 5", I'll be the first to give you credit.
Called what? A cycle of model undulations 4 days out?
Same people who would have milked his chode for nailing the 3' blizzard runs 72 hours out in 1/27/15.
Me being greedy with snow as just as good as you being greedy with 4 WS titles in 16 years.
I can appreciate a rebuild cycle,....you can appreciate 8" over 36 hours.
Congrats.