Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    72,761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. It's all good, I mean I bust balls with the best of them, but he's made his point. Maybe I overdid it, but I'll decide that on Wednesday.
  2. I should have been a bit more conservative at that range, as I didn't account for the attenuation of the wave enough...but it's just a first map.
  3. I just said the 18"+ was intended to be isolated ...its posters like this that discourage some of the pros that we'd like to attract. It wasn't a final call, regardless. Ideally I would have posted a first call today, but I work and have a family, so didn't have a choice. Jesus....
  4. I never bailed on anything...I guessed 12z EPS would tic s...what is the big deal?
  5. Biggest change was cutting the JP are in SW CT....actually increased here a hair.
  6. As long as we don't have wave spacing issues, this should bump back....but need too see how much more of a comp we have w GFS first.
  7. Maybe...just several events in a row of some of the lowest totals around. Tiresome.
  8. How is it not that diff from 00z, yet a big nod to the GFS? Sounds like IMBY goggles. My guess is big cut n of pike
  9. Yea, if we alter the timescale as far as how the SW interacts with the block, then new ballgame. I was more hopeful for this through the weekend, but getting late now. We need to see the EURO do that in the next 30 minutes to realistically consider it.
  10. My guess is it won't change much....people always a pick a cycle as this "come to jesus suite" during which all guidance undergoes an epiphany, but it seems pretty locked in.
  11. Labeling a run as BS without looking at what it is doing is silly. The GFS and UK both make sense due to respective handling of the SW evolution, but are both likely wrong.
  12. Did you see the mid levels? If it delays the dampening of the SW, then it makes sense. Probably wrong, but not nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...