All Activity

No, not at all....6" of paste, vs 10" of powder that blows off of the driveway while the rest of SNE gets 1978? Like....hey, you can either bang this plain looking check with a bit of a FUPA, or watch your best friend pile-drive your smoke-show wife for 24 hours unabated. Hmmm....tough choice, said no one from Methuen, ever.

Losing 35-7 to Alabama hurts less than losing 17-10 to BC

Disturbing from GYX. I’m ready to be done. As has been observed with Todays`s forecast, and now Saturday`s forecast, the cold has a way of winning out in these borderline spring warm up events. The ridge next week is still showing up as being highly amplified, but a notable change since last night`s runs has been toward a less amplified ridge. Temperatures still look warm in New England, but there`s been a notable trend southward with the colder air across Quebec. Should this trend continue, it will once again bring the cooler air into New England and risk thwarting the warm up in both amplitude and duration. Again, this still has not shown up on the models, but it`s a potential outcome to continue to monitor for over the next few days given the pattern and recent experience.

Long range is meh. Looks like we might be done.

My point was your image was deceiving....lets pretend for a moment that was an image relevant to the event in question, which it wasn't, it may have been depicting a brief period of snow at the onset before a quick changeover.

I hope you are seeking counseling.

6" or bust for Weymouth!

might be in a decent spot to get ZR? either that or an epic scalping

Feb NAO actually came in at +0.68, which is a tad more positive than my likely range of +0.35 to +0.60. So, that means DJF came in at -0.11, which is within the neutral territory of -0.25 to +0.25. Thus, there still has yet to be a sub -0.25 DJF NAO with 35+ DJF averaged sunspots since 1980 meaning the long streak lives on. Monthly NAO back to 1950: https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/pna/norm.nao.monthly.b5001.current.ascii.table SIDC monthly sunspots: https://www.sidc.be/SILSO/DATA/SN_m_tot_V2.0.txt

With convection we know how things like to peal to the right. The hope is you get the big lift coinciding with just enough cold. I’m not even sure sleet is a big deal in borderline areas with 925s not that cold. Almost either rain or snow.

Day 39 in-a-row of solid pack on Cape Cod. I'm happy we'll at least get to 40, which doesn't happen very often. Looks like we can get to 43-44 before melt armageddon.

Not sure I see GFS, EURO and NAM all burping in concert at hr 18, but possible, I guess.

You are better than that.

Impressive depths, especially ft kent. Seems those days are long gone. Sent from my SM-S921U using Tapatalk

I'm not saying it's marching back to Maine...just stabilizing with perhaps a tickle northward.

40F. Busting high. Sent from my SM-S921U using Tapatalk

mm perhaps, but it physically can't go N in this case, not unless the blocking high pressure/synoptic structuring en masse are reconfigured. I don't personally see how that is happening or can? I would almost argue instead that this is a bump run. May even correct the same amt the other way on the next cycle.

Like I said with the blizzard......I would have rather it trended so far north that I had 6" of slush, then what happened.

That’s mind numbing but ok. You’re fucked.

I'll take the over on 1-3"...but I'd rather get 4" and Boston rain, then 5" and Boston 9". 100%.

Yup, nice check. I wasn't "checked out because of the blizzard"...I actually wrote a shit load on content on the blog AFTER the blizzard, which is why I was looking forward to a perceived break.

Yeah he not getting much ZR

Yesterday's low-RH 46° settled/melted 2/3 of the overnight 2.8", leaving a solid 20" pack. We've twice had 48" depth in March, on 3/1/08 from the last siggy snowfall of that snowy winter, and 3/31/01 - had 19" dump on 30-31. In Fort Kent we reached 65" on 3/14/84 as 26.5" fell atop a 42" pack.

Warmer though. Congrats on 1-3” vs 8”