Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,673
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

Richmond Metro/Hampton Roads Area Discussion


RIC Airport
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, RVASnowLover said:

I don’t remember offhand but it’s a good model. Believe surprisingly CMC did best with the last storm. It was always the most northern model and ended up being accurate 

I disagree I think oddly enough that the NAM did the best as it sniffed out the north jump first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a cutoff upper low and not a shortwave passing off the coast, I don't think the standard NW trend applies here.  If that is what you are pinning your hopes on, expect dissappointment.  It's just as likely to be further east as it is west.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Avid6eek said:

Being a cutoff upper low and not a shortwave passing off the coast, I don't think the standard NW trend applies here.  If that is what you are pinning your hopes on, expect dissappointment.  It's just as likely to be further east as it is west.

Agree. With this kind of setup its more common for it to trend east than west 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no SE ridge that pumps up over consective model runs to push the low further NW.  Everything is going to be dictated by where the low cuts off and the natural thermal gradient between the coastline and gulf stream.  Just my $.02. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Wakefield

 

 One more
thing to note is with respect to SLRs with this storm- the ratios
will likely be much higher than 10:1 given how cold it will be
and with the lack of a warm nose in the 850-700 mb layer
(especially inland). The probs referenced above are for 10:1
ratios so actual probabilities for listed snow amounts may be
higher.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ldub23 said:

From Wakefield

 

 One more
thing to note is with respect to SLRs with this storm- the ratios
will likely be much higher than 10:1 given how cold it will be
and with the lack of a warm nose in the 850-700 mb layer
(especially inland). The probs referenced above are for 10:1
ratios so actual probabilities for listed snow amounts may be
higher.

I could see where if somebody gets .2 inches of precipitation it will equate to 4 inches of snow with this system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...