Jump to content

USCG RS

Members
  • Posts

    2,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by USCG RS

  1. I am speaking as an emergency manager right now. Anyone who is in the path of this ice storm, you must prepare. There is the possibility of over 1" of ice somewhere and any of you in the potential path of this must be ready.

    To do so I suggest 

    Fill up you gas tanks.

    Be prepared to be without heat, hot water and electricity for up to two weeks

    Fill up on bottles water and keep it some place interior and insulated so it does not freeze.

    If you lose heat.. Keep the water running to prevent frozen pipes (at least during the initial after freeze)

    If the house becomes too cold, use a vehicle for heat. Run it for ten to fifteen min and warm up. Then shut off for thirty min. Continue this cycle as necessary. Ensure you are not enclosed in your garage (Carbon Monoxide kills).

    Be prepared to not be able to travel for several days.

    Ensure you have an adequate supply of medication.

    Keep your cellular phone charged and use it sparingly when there is no electricity. You can use your vehicle to charge your phone.

    Have warm clothes handy.

    This is a potentially disastrous situation. Please remain vigilant, you and you alone are responsible for your safety. 

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  2. Only reason and it’s probably a stupid one that I suspect this could end up moving east is the GFS which tends to overphase anytime there’s northern stream involvement isn’t really doing that more than the Euro/UKMET at all.  The southern wave as NJ pointed out I believe earlier has done what we wanted the last 36 hours but the northern stream has gone ape on the UKMET/Euro cancelling that out or even making the setup worse.  The GFS not cranking the track more NW than those two models given what they’ve trended towards deviates somewhat from what I would expect.  If those other models are getting too happy with that northern stream this could end up surprising us over the next 36 hours by moving further southeast 
    Yes sir. I have said this about the ukie for the most part. It has not been too grabby except for last run where it had a bit of interaction and was able to grab a bit because it's outrunning the cold a bit. I know I've put my cards on the table before. I just agree.

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

    • Like 1
  3. I am sure there is no consensus on this yet, but has this storm's start time been moving steadily earlier? The WSW has a initiation of 12 p.m., but I wouldn't expect snow that early on LI. Are we looking at 3 p.m. or so now or am I reading things wrong?
    It has been transitioning earlier. Also the NWS likes to issue warnings with a good lead time.

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  4. Ignore the temperatures on the GFS and the Canadian. Follow the Euro and then blend in the NAM once within 48 hours.
    Anyway, major positive changes regarding the track of the surface low. This opens the door for backside snows.
    9eh0MCW.gif&key=a77d53535da71b094d09320866bc4dd456e9627c7ce7e61d2116167e78efe2b3
    Also. The Euro and NAM have both shifted significantly South the last two runs for the storm affecting the area tonight. There's nothing to say this won't happen with the storm Sunday.

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  5. I would use extreme caution with the NAM, it's still flopping around wildly at H5

    tp5x4Ff.gif&key=0d2337fc73011c5dfc06cf140e01de9330a5bdde5274f00ee8b55b1d5860f41d

    Yes. And not making synoptic sense always. I have not dissected this run yet, but last night it had the Vort max in Texas jump from W to E instead of rounding the base of the trough. I'll look later.. But as you said, from initial looks it's jumping at h5 a good bit

     

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

     

     

     

  6. That's too bad. You know your stuff and if you say snow I pay attention. We all make mistakes. 
    I still believe that this ends up as more snow for the region than we think. I believe the LP does not make it up to Pittsburgh as shown verbatim, for reasons I've laid it before. Now.. We wait and see.

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

    • Like 3
  7. [mention=16501]SandySurvivor[/mention] you can't compare the effects of Michael in Georgia since it didn't make landfall there. I'm sure you saw the damage between Mexico city Beach and Panama City Florida. Michael's affects at landfall were much worse than sandy as far as destruction in the typical sense. However sandy affected a larger area and was costlier. So it depends how you define "worse". Michael was A high end cat 4 at landfall and some suggest it may be upgraded to a cat 5 in the coming years when the full analysis is completed. Not trying to downplay sandy but if it didn't occur at high tide during the moon cycle it would not have caused so much damage. 
    Albany GA is 150-160 miles north of where LF was. Though the storm was still packing cat 2 winds, it was nowhere near LF

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

    • Like 1
  8. Not a fairly strong SLP like this and certainly not that far SE. That's quite the improvement. 

    Strength- true. With regards to SE , the placement of the low has been within 50-75 miles itself for the most part.

     

    Edit: I also believe the strength is due to the model honing in on the true temp gradient that will be in play here. Therefore.. Pushes it further SE and gives it a good boost of strength.

     

    Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...