-
Posts
2,479 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Posts posted by USCG RS
-
-
Let's see if the Ukie holds and shifts further south. I believe it will.It's just two models and not the two most reliable given the range. I would wait for the rest of the 0Z suite before determining theres been a major shift
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
It says@rjay quoted me?
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk -
Yes sir. I have said this about the ukie for the most part. It has not been too grabby except for last run where it had a bit of interaction and was able to grab a bit because it's outrunning the cold a bit. I know I've put my cards on the table before. I just agree.Only reason and it’s probably a stupid one that I suspect this could end up moving east is the GFS which tends to overphase anytime there’s northern stream involvement isn’t really doing that more than the Euro/UKMET at all. The southern wave as NJ pointed out I believe earlier has done what we wanted the last 36 hours but the northern stream has gone ape on the UKMET/Euro cancelling that out or even making the setup worse. The GFS not cranking the track more NW than those two models given what they’ve trended towards deviates somewhat from what I would expect. If those other models are getting too happy with that northern stream this could end up surprising us over the next 36 hours by moving further southeast
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
It has been transitioning earlier. Also the NWS likes to issue warnings with a good lead time.I am sure there is no consensus on this yet, but has this storm's start time been moving steadily earlier? The WSW has a initiation of 12 p.m., but I wouldn't expect snow that early on LI. Are we looking at 3 p.m. or so now or am I reading things wrong?
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
To me it looks to be how the model is transitioning the CCB to a DCBI mean over Northern NJ.Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
You mean behind it?Why is it showing such a dry tongue with the low along the coast
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
That's because the LP was just E of you and therefore you were on the backside and mid levels had cooled. S CT was still having warm air flooded in mid levels as it was just North of the LP.2/13/2014
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
This storm is moving along the temperature gradient. If the storm outruns the cold, the temperature gradient is displaced further NW. In turn, the storm rides the boundary further NW. Thus.. Less snow.Please explain what you mean thanks!
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 1
- 2
-
If this continues to speed up, it out runs the cold, thus the gradient shifts NWYea this seems to be moving more toward a Sat Afternoon-Sunday Morning event as opposed to a Sunday event.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
But we won'tYesterday models shifted South and then last night and this morning some came back North a bit. This is nothing more than your typical windshield wiper effect and a lot of people on here should take a break and come back tomorrow night.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 2
-
Also. The Euro and NAM have both shifted significantly South the last two runs for the storm affecting the area tonight. There's nothing to say this won't happen with the storm Sunday.Ignore the temperatures on the GFS and the Canadian. Follow the Euro and then blend in the NAM once within 48 hours.
Anyway, major positive changes regarding the track of the surface low. This opens the door for backside snows.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
Yes. And not making synoptic sense always. I have not dissected this run yet, but last night it had the Vort max in Texas jump from W to E instead of rounding the base of the trough. I'll look later.. But as you said, from initial looks it's jumping at h5 a good bitI would use extreme caution with the NAM, it's still flopping around wildly at H5Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
-
-
-
Im saying it's a model depiction. I believe thr Ukie has the right idea but it's not there yet. I don't believe this is a transfer situation.It goes from almost up to Pittsburgh South and east to Southern Maryland. Nothing could force it to travel south
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
I don't believe this transfers. I believe this is truly baroclinically driven.Quite possible. Need an early transfer to really get the business.Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
I still believe that this ends up as more snow for the region than we think. I believe the LP does not make it up to Pittsburgh as shown verbatim, for reasons I've laid it before. Now.. We wait and see.That's too bad. You know your stuff and if you say snow I pay attention. We all make mistakes.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 3
-
Yeah. I'm guilty of this here. I didn't look at the LP in the frame before it scoots to the delmarvaNo matter how many times we tell them, if they have the snow goggles on the primary could track to Buffalo and they would say all snow.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
This is true.. And I am wrong. Apologies.No it wouldn't. Primary tracks too far north. You would not avoid torched midlevels.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
Albany GA is 150-160 miles north of where LF was. Though the storm was still packing cat 2 winds, it was nowhere near LF[mention=16501]SandySurvivor[/mention] you can't compare the effects of Michael in Georgia since it didn't make landfall there. I'm sure you saw the damage between Mexico city Beach and Panama City Florida. Michael's affects at landfall were much worse than sandy as far as destruction in the typical sense. However sandy affected a larger area and was costlier. So it depends how you define "worse". Michael was A high end cat 4 at landfall and some suggest it may be upgraded to a cat 5 in the coming years when the full analysis is completed. Not trying to downplay sandy but if it didn't occur at high tide during the moon cycle it would not have caused so much damage.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
[mention=16501]sandysurvivor[/mention] if you would like to discuss your assertion in regards to Sandy and Michael, I am willing to in here
-
Strength- true. With regards to SE , the placement of the low has been within 50-75 miles itself for the most part.Not a fairly strong SLP like this and certainly not that far SE. That's quite the improvement.Edit: I also believe the strength is due to the model honing in on the true temp gradient that will be in play here. Therefore.. Pushes it further SE and gives it a good boost of strength.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
Interestingly enough.. Much stronger low this time around.UK is a little bit SE of where it was for the monster crush job on 1/15 at 0Z...
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
- 1
January 19-20th Winter Storm Threat
in New York City Metro
Posted
I am speaking as an emergency manager right now. Anyone who is in the path of this ice storm, you must prepare. There is the possibility of over 1" of ice somewhere and any of you in the potential path of this must be ready.
To do so I suggest
Fill up you gas tanks.
Be prepared to be without heat, hot water and electricity for up to two weeks
Fill up on bottles water and keep it some place interior and insulated so it does not freeze.
If you lose heat.. Keep the water running to prevent frozen pipes (at least during the initial after freeze)
If the house becomes too cold, use a vehicle for heat. Run it for ten to fifteen min and warm up. Then shut off for thirty min. Continue this cycle as necessary. Ensure you are not enclosed in your garage (Carbon Monoxide kills).
Be prepared to not be able to travel for several days.
Ensure you have an adequate supply of medication.
Keep your cellular phone charged and use it sparingly when there is no electricity. You can use your vehicle to charge your phone.
Have warm clothes handy.
This is a potentially disastrous situation. Please remain vigilant, you and you alone are responsible for your safety.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk