Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
  • Posts

    61,736
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. GFS staring danger in the face with a middle finger so far. Not backing down
  2. ok, 66 .if anything the freezing line is a hair south of where it was at 18z
  3. Seems like noise so far, but 0z axis is tilted just a lil more than 18z. otherwise, they remain identical
  4. GFS doesn't seem to be backing down...almost twin copy of 18z so far at sfc
  5. Not even close to the 18z GFS. This model is stupid. (until it shows what we want)
  6. Yeah, as the main slug of moisture before the wave starts moving up, the front is just stuck in WV and even moves NW just a tiny bit
  7. the move south is there, but much more so over KY, OH. Where we need it to get souther is just held up..
  8. I actually hope I'm wrong, so don't jump down my throat. Anyway, sfc freezing like made a move S and E toward the area vs 18z...I'm at 69...heh
  9. heights in the most important part are not lower...compare the h5 maps between 18z and 0z. Ill die on that hill. Maybe a met can solve. 60 vs 66. If I'm wrong, I'll admit it, no problem.
  10. Theres some light precip at 54 with what looks like CAD, with shallow cold but won't hold.
  11. I am. Let's see what happens. Lower heights should allow the cold to press in a little quicker
  12. Can't totally agree with that. I know where you're looking..I'm looking at our latitude and north. We'll see
  13. Looking at the H5 on the NAM, can't say I'm encouraged. Heights slightly higher at 30
  14. Where are the SREF people? It's not a real future fail without those being brought out.
  15. Got a thread in the chamber, with a New England style title and everything. Check for it shortly.
  16. Usually when the GFS doubles down against all the other models it ends up right. lol no it doesn’t. Just saying a weenie hope-ium
×
×
  • Create New...