Jump to content

Buddy1987

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,952

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Buddy1987

  1. Buddy1987
    I believe the 6z Nam and Gfs may have made me want to look at another run or two before I give in. That’s one hell of a qpf field to my east. Any more trends west and I could be looking at something a little more than I expected.
  2. Buddy1987
    Well... it was fun while it lasted lol. Nam may look worse than 18z.
  3. Buddy1987
    Yea guys unfortunately thus far I see nothing meaningful that would translate back to the 12z run. That was pretty epic. Trough axis is still positively tilted. I’m out to 26
  4. Buddy1987
    Nam run should be initializing soon. The thing that killed us today was that darn bowling ball that drops out of Minnesota. I believe HKY and myself caught this around the 57-66 hr Mark. Keep an eye on that as to how telling the run will be for tonight’s 0z run, along with the orientation of the trough axis. Two indicators if this thing goes the right or wrong way on us.
  5. Buddy1987
    Bring the goods Wow! Talk to me.
  6. Buddy1987
    My lord. Its like a darn bowling ball dropping down. Much more pronounced then the last view runs of the NAM. Definitely adversely affected precip being able to stream more northward and shunted everything off to the east. Need that pesky thing to get out the way.
  7. Buddy1987
    Still think this is gonna be one heck of a qpf run for someone. The trough axis or the orientation of it is slightly more positively tilted, however it is not that much difference when comparing the 60hr image from the 12z. Much more qpf noted too in MS/AL/GA this run. Edit: Ahh I see now. The GL low has shifted significantly more southward, thus not allowing for the trough to tilt more neutral. There is a sizable difference noted in that aspect.
  8. Buddy1987
    18Z Nam is showing me what I thought it should have looked like at 12z. Pooling of moisture evident over LA,MS and AL.
  9. Buddy1987
    Here is the image I am looking at presently.
  10. Buddy1987
    HR 42 the trough is extremely sharpened once again, albeit it has a slightly positive tilt to it. I still think this ends up somewhat similar to the 12z. Could be wrong though.
  11. Buddy1987
    I just want to know what type of implication the base of the trough has, when comparing hour 33 to 39. How does that affect the tilt down the road in the upcoming frames? It looks even sharper than 12z and holding it back, but yet looks more positively tilted on the northern half.
  12. Buddy1987
    At 25 it is wanting to hold the s/w back over the southwest more. Not sure how that translates down the road here.
  13. Buddy1987
    Hmm thats interesting. Thanks for the clarification.
  14. Buddy1987
    I am just slightly confused by this. So it is not as amped as last run? Or is the precip coverage better this go around?
  15. Buddy1987
    Lolllllllllllll... for some god unknown reason, I had high point in my head. That’s great. Sorry on the confusion!
  16. Buddy1987
    Yes I am.
  17. Buddy1987
    I consider you and I, along with the western folks to be in a good spot right now.
  18. Buddy1987
    I still believe we will see a system leaning toward the more amped versions. This has been an evolving thing the last couple of days, whereas the models are playing catchup with the strength of the trough and with the continuation of moving the GL further north, northeast.
  19. Buddy1987
    The finger of glory! Trough axis perfect to advect moisture for western areas and one could say for the Triad as well.
  20. Buddy1987
    Ive seen it do this garbage so many times. It stays southeast, and then within 48 hours it will support the camps that are all in general agreement. Canadian and CMC will be telling. UKIE will be a precursor to the EURO imo.
  21. Buddy1987
    GFS and NAM are night and day at 57. Much more progressive on the side of GFS, with positive tilt almost exclusively the entire time. More keying on the 1st wave noted on the GFS. I really feel like its still on an island in respect to the other models.
  22. Buddy1987
    I think the general theme so far I see out of the 12z gfs is that it too is trying to really sharpen the base of the trough in the same location as the nam did, in and around central OK. May be a sign of caving coming from the model.
  23. Buddy1987
    NAM and GFS through 27 not too far apart from one another at 5h. Trough is a little more positively tilted comparing it to the nam at the same timeframe. Edit: More noticeable with the positive tilt at 30.
  24. Buddy1987
    Both. I think future frames will correlate and show with the Gulf wide open the way it is progged that in turn there will be more moisture influx. The tilt of the trough really helps and benefits the trend NW.
  25. Buddy1987
    From Bob Chill in mid atlantic forum: Jan 2000?
×
×
  • Create New...