Jump to content

JC-CT

Members
  • Posts

    17,866
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JC-CT

  1. That one is still out there - showing up multiple runs but could look like anything. verbatim it looks like a swfe
  2. What's the rule of thumb re: how big the warm layer is to be ice vs fz rain?
  3. what's the thinking on IP vs FZRA in a setup like this? Or is it too early
  4. The numbers seemed inconsistent to me at the time with the observations coming, I called it like I see it. I still can't fully reconcile what he reported throughout the day with other obs that ended up like his, but it's clear that his area did significantly better than mine and his final total has support. It was a very difficult storm to measure, and it was a frustrating storm for me. @Damage In TollandI apologize, it doesnt matter if I was wrong or right, it was unnecessary regardless.
  5. Yeah, your reported amount was inconsistent with where the banding was and a bunch of other reports from people here and from the NWS, including one that was 2,000 feet from you that was literally half of what you said. Just thought maybe you were measuring snow the same way you look at rgem clown maps, that's all. But if it's good, it's good.
  6. Interesting. Definitely seems sus in SEMA
  7. Very little ice verbatim for taunton
  8. Yeah, the real ice is up your way on that run. TT 6 hour precip + ptype in time is not going to be an accurate reflection.
  9. Decided to start a dedicated thread for this threat:
  10. What does that have to do with knowing vs not knowing how long it is until a modeled event starts?
  11. Literally weenies everywhere. I know exactly where these guys live...they are exactly 1 mile away from each other.
  12. That dude in Coventry on twitter reported 25:1 ratios from 11am to 2pm.
  13. Even they aren't great for anything other than general pattern recognition
  14. Sandy gave the Euro a mystique that was probably never quite deserved to the extent it was granted.
  15. biggest one I personally remember was in Feb (2011)
  16. I'd be curious if anyone has taken a core. It's definitely possible that ratios were better further west of the big band.
  17. These modeled strung out frontal waves do seem to like to amp up in the mid range
  18. Well I'm not going to argue with an eyewitness. So Tolland/Vernon looked like a legit 14-15 new to you? That really is amazing. Totally under the radar, must have been low level stuff?
  19. Well then congrats, and it is still fascinating.
  20. Right, I'm aware. And I believe an extra 3 to maybe even 5" after 3pm because those bands are usually high ratio stuff. But it wasnt the Worcester band, and 13" at like 330-4pm seems very off. Would also mean Kevin only got an additional 1" after that, which is also believable because those bands were definitely better further north into MA.
  21. If it's right, it's fascinating - but his 11am and 2pm measurements don't line up at all with your noon measurement of 8-9 or your afternoon measurement of 13".
×
×
  • Create New...