Jump to content

FlatLander48

Members
  • Posts

    2,037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FlatLander48

  1. Not that I really believe it's an implication of anything, more of just a note I'm making: If you look at hour one of the NAM and compare it to current radar for say Texas, since that's where part A of our storm will get going, there's a considerable amount more moisture around than even the NAM is showing. Again, just a note.

    • Like 2
    • Weenie 1
  2. 14 minutes ago, StantonParkHoya said:

    I can’t believe sun angle hasn’t been mentioned once. You SE crew are a more upstanding group than us degenerates in MA.

    Sun angle usually doesn't get mentioned here til the day before. Usually snow modeled 24+ hours away generally turns to rain before we have a chance to talk about it.

    • Haha 1
  3. 6 minutes ago, BornAgain13 said:

    So are the globals really that important right now? Just curious of y'alls thoughts ..  or should we focus more on short range

    Yes, globals are always important, especially now, as there are still not enough short term modeling to go by at this range.

    • Weenie 1
  4. 2 minutes ago, AsheCounty48 said:

    GFS at Hour 42, I believe that the trajectory looks the tiniest bit more of a SW/NW flow, believe it will come north a tad, though nothings stands out really compared to the 6z.

    Hour 48, 50-75 mile push north compared to 6z. Also showing a tendency at the same time frame over the last couple of runs (still at 48) of the storm appearing stronger each run. at least in terms of precip rates.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...