Jump to content

Radtechwxman

Members
  • Posts

    2,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Radtechwxman

  1. 5 minutes ago, WeatherMonger said:

    I'm just going to go buy about 50lbs of poly fill and stake it down across the front yard.

     

    This has been a depressing 8 days of winter.......

    I certainly had higher hopes for this pattern but should have known the feet of snow was too good to be true. Ha. 

  2. Euro so close to having me in better accumulations. I'm like riding the mixing line. Definitely going to miss the heaviest swath but would be nice to get high end advisory snow or low end warning criteria at least. 

  3. 2 minutes ago, Frog Town said:

    I was only kidding.  I'm still in the bargaining stage of my grief.  

     

    You and me both. Still holding a sliver of hope for maybe a front end thump and some decent back end snows. But unfortunately rain in between looks very likely. 

  4. 2 minutes ago, mjwise said:

    Only about a 350 mile movement on the slp location versus the 12z run, where it was making for Wisconsin via Dubuque when the run ended...

    Hrrr and nam on the same drugs apparently 

  5. 2 minutes ago, CheeselandSkies said:

    That 18Z HRRR gives some parts of southern WI and far northern IL nearly 1" in an hour toward the end of the run with the snow far from over. Sorry, south of I-80 (possibly even I-88) folks.

    If you're trusting hrrr at this range the joke will be on you. Lol. It did terrible at this range with previous system. 

  6. 5 minutes ago, A-L-E-K said:

    getting a low 907s bomb into your sweet spot in mid january and getting a rainer would be an all-time L 

    we deserve better

    Guessing you meant 970s bomb. Lol. 907s and rain would really be something in Jan. Ha

    • Haha 1
  7. 5 minutes ago, Stebo said:

    LLJ going to win out, I would lean warmer and we have seen warmer yesterday. The only saving grace to the north and east could be a quicker occlusion but beyond that the warmth along and east of the low track should win out.

    I'm north of the Peoria metro area. Seem to start as snow Thurs night then mix into afternoon Fri and changeover to snow on back end of deformation zone. It has mixing line close to river again. Could be close call here. Team gfs. Ha

  8. This one is starting to look like a dud here. Still crazy how this one tracks further south than first storm and I end up with less snow and more rain. This system seems to really pull up a big slug of warm air compared to the other. Hoping it can trend cooler aloft as we get closer but not hopeful. 

  9. 5 minutes ago, SchaumburgStormer said:

    The OP run appears to be on the NW side of the cluster. Lots of member E-SE still. OP has the low over Gary. 

    sfcmslp-meanmem.us_mw.png

    Crazy how close we are to event and still so much spread. Was thinking sampling this morning would be helpful for models. I was wrong. Lol. I'm not sure what to expect. 

    • Like 1
  10. Man the warm nose with this is BRUTAL. The low actually looks to potentially track more se than last one but still showing a lot of precip type issues because of that warm nose. Of course we couldn't get the arctic air in time for this. I'm actually a bit more nervous with this one versus last. Hoping we can see a correction se like with yesterday's storm last second. Same areas that just scored big may do it again with this one. I really hate El Nino winters. 

  11. 7 minutes ago, HillsdaleMIWeather said:

    With the snowpack and airmass the warm air issues on the NAM and Euro both seem just odd

    I thought the same thing. But GFS does it to. But not as long as nam and euro. Just seems crazy to get that north of a warm slug with where the sfc low is tracking. It's south of where current storm is. 

×
×
  • Create New...