Jump to content

Damage In Tolland

Members
  • Posts

    113,044
  • Joined

Everything posted by Damage In Tolland

  1. It’s possible many areas hit 60 if warm models are correct. And then you bring all that wind down to the surface even interior
  2. 2.5 days out . I am quite sure that map will not verify . Either it’s much too low for the whole region .. or .. it’s too high. I just think that scenario there is least likely
  3. His hairs up on his property at 1400’ , but his feet are down lower on the 1050’ area
  4. Here come the Messenger shuffles after a few Mets bought the NAM ram to Buffalo
  5. If Ryans and Scooters forecasts about the NAM being right with temps near 60 and damaging winds are correct , I’ll meet you there at 1:00
  6. Why are Ryan and Scooter saying the NAM is correct? Yet normally it’s amped solutions are tossed by them. Interesting
  7. Granted it’s not much of one , but nice to see even the best of em can melt down a bit. After this cold and dry . Bitter pills
  8. What about the 3-5” glacier OTG prior to storm ? If we stay at 34.. you’d think you’d come east with some pack .
  9. Hoping that’s the case here. Still have 3.5-4” of glacier . Hoping to maintain pack
  10. You do realize that’s the weakening primary right? The secondary development that tracks along s coast helps interior stay in 30’s after thump . And that’s assuming that odd track there verified
  11. What kind of answer is that . Just issue numbers . Who cares if you’re wrong . You said today you’re not a forecaster anymore for work
  12. You have struggled immensely with this. And never actually issuing a forecast or amounts. Why can’t you just put numbers out?
  13. That’s a done deal . No one in our area is getting that unless we see 100 mile shift which isn’t likely. This is just a swfe on roids for most of NE. The key is ti get the secondary to track over the far outer Cape which is Climo for Jan and seems highly likely . As long as that happens .. it’s a net gainer even for BOS
×
×
  • Create New...