Technically speaking, a watch is 50% confidence while the forecast ("wind gusts up to 45 mph") is the most likely outcome. So while it's not ideal for the forecast to not match criteria of the headline, it is possible.
I only use the median when it shows a more exciting number.
But yes, in this case it tells a lot about last evening's model runs when compared to the mean.
FWIW, the NBM has a mean around 3.8" for FIT but a median of 4.7", so there are actually quite a lot of pieces of guidance (much like individual EPS members) that are real soakers.
My problem has been finding info on exactly what the scheme is to improve the moist physics.
Their little scorecard thing shows some subtle North America improvement beyond 144 hours in the heights and MSLP over the control.
In theory ditching some of the wonky diabatic heating related solutions could improve synoptics. But if it doesn't snow in my backyard we toss in favor of the Canadian.
Rather than watching the Jets I'll watch Italy/Belgium.
PWM is really looking like it will challenge 2017 for some of the warm records, especially when it comes to low temps (like fewest <40 days).
Only two seasons there.
There is something elegant about the season of abundance and the season of shortage, but it's harder to mow down New Yorkers in the middle of the highway.
Yeah, once we were moving horizontal it was a very smooth ride, but the takeoff threw my stomach for a loop. For a split second I was worried I was going to be one of those people grabbing the barf bag.
We don't toss.
It's actually a really odd sensation taking off. I'm used to flying on a plane, but a vertical take off felt really strange (Maui to Molokai).
Tried to do a second flight when I bought my wife a surprise tour on our honeymoon (below) but they cancelled on us because one of their helicopters was down for maintenance.