Jump to content

Blizzard-on-GFS

Members
  • Posts

    697
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Blizzard-on-GFS

  1. image.thumb.png.a345275e5bf547899e9ffdd520a33ba0.png

    Nearly all of the MESO models show an intense band of roughly 60 MPH sustained winds making its way up the barrier islands of NJ. It's hard to believe but almost every model has it. Gusts would be even higher. I know it's crazy but these winds would probably warrant a hurricane warning for these areas; I doubt the warnings will be hoisted but it will be interesting to see how bad it gets. 

  2. Not to be a downer but it's a shame this sub forum is dead. I'll be riding this storm out down LBI but there's not many people here to talk too. It's kind of annoying being a drifter between the Mid-Atlantic, NY, and New England sub-forums to find discussion. The true philly/jersey shore area posts get stuck here. Just my 2 cents, I get it if this post is deleted. Just please don't 5 post me. 

    • Weenie 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, The Iceman said:

    GFS and NAM take basically an identical track with nearly identical timing, the difference being the GFS is 4 MB deeper with the low. Huge difference though with temperatures. The NAM(and ICON) at 18z saturday has the 95 area in the mid-20's with the LV in the low 20's-upper teens while the GFS at the same time is near freezing already in the 95 area with the LV in the mid-upper 20's. Is it a result of the GFS being more amped than the NAM/ICON thus bringing more warm air? Or are the NAM?/ICON just handling the CAD better than the GFS? Will be interesting to see what the euro says.

    Probably a combination of both. I think we end up somewhere in the middle. 1-3” of slop to rain for I-95. 2-5” northwest of there. 

  4. Ok maybe my snow-starved eyes are deceiving me but the moisture shield looks way further north and west then projected on the models. I'm not understanding how it isn't going to swing through the area with at least a coating to an inch.... Just a really weird storm, the low takes the benchmark track, juicy moisture shield, yet we are mostly projected to get nothing. Guess we will see soon enough. 

  5. On 12/6/2019 at 10:50 PM, Newman said:

    Could not agree more. I'm very active on other NYC centered forums but it's tough with the clear bias. Here many of us experience the same weather and it would be great to talk more but it's not worth my time if there's only like 5 or 6 total members that post here lol.

    I totally agree. To be honest I only come to the Philly thread for observations during events, most of the model discussion happens in the NYC thread. I know we've broached this subject before but I'd be fine with the merger of NYC/Philly. As a CNJ/South Jersey resident I feel caught between two areas. Just my two cents though. 

  6. Man this one hurts, Warned for 4-8” in Mercer county,  NJ and we literally got nothing. Hoping to salvage an inch of scraps on the back end as the HRRR alludes to but at this point I’m thinking this one is game, set, set and match. We are really overdue for a nice cold Miller A to bury the whole sub. 

  7. 36 minutes ago, RedSky said:

    If i had to pick a guidance map at this time this is it

    I didn't have a 2" snow last winter until March and then just barely, so this is also winning

     

     

     

    EPS121.png

    I think this solution is off the table table at this point. All of the Mesoscale models and now even the goofus show the CNJ death banding. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...