Jump to content

DomNH

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    7,811
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DomNH

  1. 8 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    This is total QPF by dawn...lets assume no accumulation during the day given inconsistent rates and solar irradiance...around a foot of cement minus the .3 wasted. Maybe even assume less than 10:1...say 10" or so.

    1712228400-sMkOfrRGPDo.png

    Verbatim it's a textbook snow sounding from like 03z to 09z then it starts to rapidly dry out up top. Can't rule out 1''+/hr poundage during that window though. Razor thin.

  2. 5 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

    NAM dries out the DGZ quickly after 12z. I think you really need to slam before that time for siggy amounts south of MHT. Unless this keeps going south.

    Was going to literally post the same thing. NAM depth change is 1-4'' from about Rt. 2 to MHT through 12z Thursday and I think that's probably what I'd go with at this point. Annoying slop but def close to something more interesting. 

    • Like 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, dendrite said:

    Cloud tops still look cold enough even when the nam pulls a little dry air into s nh at h7. Just need to get the forcing to overcome your 2m temps. I should be ok up here. 

    You're def in a "great" spot. I have a flight out of MHT later Thursday afternoon so I'm rooting for the slot. 

  4. 2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    I think it can accumulate during the day ok with these soundings....but the key is keeping H6-7 saturated and getting decent rates. If it goes slotty with light rates, then it won't matter. But if you're going moderate to heavy snow at noontime with 850 temps in the -9C range and 925s in the -4C range, it's pretty hard to not accumulate. But the key is not slotting aloft....we want to keep that H7 WF to the south of us. 

    Those 0.15 to 0.2" QPF in 3 hours won't cut it...need over 0.25" every 3 hours.

    Yeah I agree. I haven't looked at the NAM soundings yet but the 06z GFS soundings here were kind of sh*t in that regard. DGZ was bone dry throughout then H7-H8 dried out pretty quickly after 12z. 

  5. 12z NAM kinda reminds me of the 06z Euro for the Rt. 2 north region. Pellets til 06z or so Thursday morning, then some slushy snow, then it gets slotty later Thursday morning into the afternoon and that'll kill any accums. Going to need to lose the sleet if we want a better chance of advisory snows overnight in this area because anything after 12-14z or so Thursday is pointless. 

    • Like 1
  6. 7 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

    I wasn't taking the map at face value when I posted about it so much as reflecting on the fact that it treneded southward again.

    Clearly I am not getting 2' of snow.

    Yes I know lol I just feel like our ceiling is going to be maybe 2-4’’ of slush tomorrow night. 

    • Like 2
  7. Problem with those GFS clown maps in this area is that most of what falls after 12z Thursday, if it’s even snow, probably isn’t accumulating much, especially on pavement. Heaviest rates are Wednesday night into Thursday which could bring a few sloppy inches but anything after that I’m skeptical. The snow depth maps aren’t all that impressive outside of the elevated areas. 

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...