Jump to content

wxeyeNH

Members
  • Posts

    9,353
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wxeyeNH

  1. 45F  Moderate rain showers with drizzle in between.  Yet these are low clouds and I can see blue patches between the stratus with the sun coming out while it is raining.  The sun is so strong I'm getting ground fog like in winter over snow in a humid airmass.  Kind of unusual.

    About .35" since last evening and 2.45" for the whole event

    Going back to the Aurora,  the big event in 2003?  I was up here.  Digital photography just begining.  With the naked eye it was awe inspiring.  Extremely noticeable.  Everyone was taking about it.  So, yes it can be that bright.  Last night was so exasperating for me as I like Astronomy.  Even the best Aurora can't compare to a full total eclipse.

    • Like 1
  2. 56 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

    was that witnessed by unaided eye, though?

    ... with camera tech the way it is, and pervasive these days, ... these auroras are photoed by way of timed exposures, that are then rendered to Twitter and other social media platforms under the auspices of, 'look what I saw last night' - leaving the part out that they could not have "seen" anything without these devices.

    I rarely see a disclaimer or any comment at all really that says, 'I am not actually worthy of the center of attention I'm seeking, because I could not have seen this without high tech assistance' 

    lol.  No but these long exposures can "see" auroras that glancing at the nocturnal firmament alone more commonly cannot detect.

    You are spot on.  It seems these days everyone uses either time exposures or some post processing.  It is very hard to know what you would see just looking up at the sky.  In general photography is blurring into art a bit.  The picture from Cromwell had to be one of these.  That bright patch could never be that white.

    • Thanks 1
  3. Just now, weathafella said:

    BOS had 96% but ACK was total.  I remember it got darker but seeing the total In 2017 made me realize there’s no comparison.   That one was hyped but 2024 has a wider totality and longer duration at the peak location.

    I went to Aruba in the 90s.  Todd Gross and family flew down too.  Jerry, you are so right.  You HAVE to be in the path of totality.  Even if you are at 99% there is still too much light.  The 2024 eclipse has a wider path, thus darker at the centerline and longer.  The West coast of Mexico has the best chance of clear skies but in the US Texas is the place to go.  I will just watch the weather leading up to it and will drive anyplace in the Northeast that looks good. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. 40 minutes ago, tamarack said:

    Last half dozen years have included 4 or 5 total lunar eclipses, none of which were visible here, thanks to clouds.  Also, my Sundays are spoken for. 

    It falls on a Monday.  Trust me,  if it looks like a chance to be clear drive to get into totality

    • Like 3
  5. 3 hours ago, DavisStraight said:

    You going to the primo spot to see it? I'm considering going, going to try and talk the wife into a few days up north.

    I went to Aruba back in the 90's to see one.  It is something you absolutely will never forget.  We were on the beach with hundreds of others.  The shadow comes across the sky and it goes dark and the stars come out.  Even people that are not into this kind of thing were blown away.  

    • Like 3
  6. Mark your calendar and put in for a vacation day now.  The astronomical event of a lifetime is coming to New England a year from today. (April 8 2024) A total eclipse of the sun. The path of totality passes through NNE.  I saw one in Aruba many years ago and it is something you will always remember.  Fingers crossed the weather is as good as today.

     

    solar eclipse 1.jpg

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...