Jump to content

psuhoffman

Members
  • Posts

    26,941
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by psuhoffman

  1. 90% of our winters end in disappointment. March snow has nothing to do with it.
  2. PD is a different date each year. Baltimore had a top 20 snow on Feb 19th. That’s layer than PD 90% of the time. So now we’re just talking 8 days? Yes there hasn’t been a too 20 event from Feb 20-28. But there have been big snows after that. It’s a fluke. If anything it means we’re due to get a storm that week! There are so many weeks without a top 20 snowstorm. They are so rare and some weeks have 3 of them meaning there are many weeks with none. The last week of December. The first week of January. January 9-21 have none! Why don’t you obsess about those? you do this with lots of things. You seem to try to assign meaning to randomness. The fact a super rare event hasn’t happened in the 140 years of records that one week is just a product of random chance. There are several other weeks without a big snow and I promise you if we had records that went back far enough you’d see that storms can happen those weeks and this is just random chance over a limited period of time.
  3. A March 2018 is possible. If we could start the cycle a week earlier and get a little more luck in our area could be good. That month was so so so close to epic and we got about as unlucky as possible to only get one decent snow that month.
  4. 3 of Baltimores 17 biggest snowstorms came in March. Baltimore has had snows of 22”, 16” and 13” in March. And 2 years ago I ran the numbers and showed that Baltimores odds of getting a 4”, 8” and 12” Storm peak the first week of February but then only decrease slightly until you get to the 3rd week of March when they drop off a cliff. You say this every year. Every single year. And one proven it’s false like 3 times and you still say it. Why?
  5. I hear you. But the last 2 ninos did you no good. My only point was assuming a Nino fixes this seems flawed. The issue hasn’t been enso.
  6. That would depend on other factors. AO being the most important. Type of Nino. If we get a +AO east based +QBO winter we might be looking at a 1992 1995 type disaster but it’s too soon to know that yet. I’m not predicting doom and gloom. We have Chuck for that. I’m just saying don’t assume the rest of this winter is going to suck and don’t assume next year will be good.
  7. But jokes aside why are you attributing our issues with enso. During the recent snow drought we’ve had 4 Nina’s. 3 neutrals and 2 ninos. And the snow results have been equally atrocious across them all for the most part. Arguably the closest we came to a good winter was 2021 which was a Nina but it was slightly too warm in DC. I got 50” here while 95 was getting 36 degree perfect track rainstorms all winter. But the issue wasn’t dry that winter! I don’t think enso had been our issue. Yes overall ninos are better and give us the best chance of a blockbuster winter. But it’s not as simple as Nino good everything else suck. We can have bad ninos and snowy Nina’s. The record -PDO the last 7 years was the bigger issue not enso.
  8. It wasn’t the best period (unfavorable NAO and PDO combo) but not as bad as recent run! 1988 was solid. 1990 great first 1/3. 1993 and 1994 were really nice winters not far NW of 95. 96 of course then Jan 2000. It wasn’t quite the sustained dreg of the recent stretch. But ya far from glory days.
  9. We are likely to have a +QBO next winter. The better ninos, 1987, 2003, 2010, 2015 were all -QBO. Not every +QBO was bad. We had some decent ones. 1988 and 2016 were ok +QBO ninos. But we’ve not had a blockbuster cold wall to wall +QBO Nino winter
  10. The -AO is going to run the table. This has all the characteristics of a year with a wall to wall -AO. Do we cash in wrt snow…stay tuned but we have the snowier half of snow climo left to go! But of course we will have to listen to the insufferable jack asses who complain that the sun melts snow after Feb 10 so we should just toss the last 40% of our snow climo because it melts faster.
  11. @Ji in my adult life we’ve had 4 unquestioned A+ snowfall winters. 2 of the 4 were ninos. In the last 20 years that I’ve lived up here I’ve had 8 winters that I’d classify as a A snowfall Winter, over 35”, and 3 of the 8 weren’t ninos and 2 were Nina’s. Yes all things considered I’d prefer a Nino. But it’s not as extreme as some are making it. People are using recency bias. But imo the pdo has been the issue not Nina.
  12. You probably have more snow now than you had that whole winter. And 1992/1995/1998 were 3 dreg ninos in a row. Im not predicting anything but Im also not putting all my eggs into just waiting on Nino to save us
  13. We had 1992, 1995 and 1998 back to back to back ninos remember prior to 2003 people thought Nino was bad for snow. 1973 and 1977 were lackluster snowfall ninos but 77 was for very different reasons. Ninos can be our absolute best winters but not all are good.
  14. I’m saying I don’t know but only about half of ninos are snowy so kicking the whole rest is this winter when we have a -AO to wait for a Nino seems weird to me.
  15. We entered that month with a torched North America so we have some advantages.
  16. Sorry I was being a bit facetious. But we did have 2 ninos and 2 enso neutral winters in this 9 year snow drought we are in. None of them did us any good. The issue we’ve had is more PDO related than enso. At the moment the PDO has chilled out and isn’t killing us. We might fail. We could get a big storm. But I see signs we might be breaking out of what’s been the biggest issue the last 9 years.
  17. We have a cold enso. That’s not negotiable. I’m working within the reality we have. We’ve had snowy months in a cold enso before. It’s not impossible. And you holding out for a Nino is silly when we have no idea yet if it will even be a favorable type of Nino. And we know the QBO and solar are unlikely to be good. We could very well end up with a Nino like 1973, 1992, 1995, 1998, 2007, 2019, 2024. Not every Nino is above normal snow…only about half are and early indication are the next Nino might have more characteristics of the less snowy variety so now you’re waiting for what…the next Nino…4-5 years from now. Ok have fun. I’ll take my chances on getting a good snowstorm out of what’s a damn good pattern coming up. Yea it’s not a Nino. If it was it would be perfect. But you act like we can’t snow outside a Nino.
  18. Feb 2006 and March 2018 prove if you have blocking the central pac isnt as important. The issue is it’s rare to get extreme blocking in that pacific pattern. Usually that pacific is destructive to blocking. But this year it doesn’t seem to matter. I’ll take the rare win.
  19. Just sayin Day 15 EPS snowiest February’s of the last 50 years and yes the pac is different because almost all those examples were ninos and a central pac ridge makes it unlikely to get blocking , that loading pattern actually correlates with a +AO. But we do have the blocking. What matters most is the N American long wave pattern is identical
  20. Can we just start ignoring the op gfs? Especially at lead times we shouldn’t be looking at any operational frankly.
  21. Charlotte is not getting 46” of snow. And I don’t care what the gfs says for 72 hours let alone 300.
×
×
  • Create New...