bncho
-
Posts
3,772 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by bncho
-
good read above ^^^
-
Ideally this is just a testament to how incredibly delicate this setup is, meaning that models likely still don't have a good handle on things? Could just be weenie copium though
-
If it were the Euro, oh dear Lord...
-
what the FUCK is the GFS
-
Why do I feel like the GFS is better? Higher heights out front and it looks like the wave is more amped? (I'm not looking at h5 though)
-
I flinched when I saw "GFS MODEL"
-
Might alos be a +PNA depth issue? Notice how it spikes less than 0z and 18z?
-
This is due to the change of cores, no?
-
I was thinking that if we had this setup in a Nino everything would be so much simpler to figure out, plus they'd probably trend the right way
-
We live in a simulation
-
This is what I saw in differences and I was like, this would be good
-
this is why randy does it, not me it was also better at the start, slightly better seperation, but the +PNA ridge more broad
-
Synoptic wise its better but surface sucks
-
Euro might cave/semi-cave because WOW is the wave amped.
-
The big takeaway of the Euro AI is that, while snowfall isn't great, Boston gets a blizzard. That means the synoptics are MUCH BETTER.
-
Synoptics are a lot better!
-
AIFS might be better, more snow for us, but the fact that Boston gets a big snow tells me that the synoptics are a LOT better
-
I know it's the GFS but we still got chances after 2/23
-
from brooklynwx99—trending more neg tilt and that +PNA ridge is trending west and more amplified
-
who else do i need to add?
-
Since it's your thread you are forced to be delusionally optimistic. So far your thread is working... so keep it up
-
I think the primary low stuff was slightly worse due to the lower heights and it was slightly less amped (?), but overall this is a good step
-
Ladies and gents, it's the 0z suite. Let's get started.
