Jump to content

DarkSharkWX

Members
  • Posts

    539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DarkSharkWX

  1. 6 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

    Since we're between model cycles, the part of my brain that, for whatever reason attaches meaning to dates and such just can't get past this list...Top 25 and not a one the last week of Feb...Even 2010 missed! Don't trust it

    Side note: All the ones I marked happened on PD weekend thar year...just sayin' ;)

    1877088571_Top-25-SnowStormsJan2016(1).jpg.1e2b359142f38fd0d6c0be9b4082c01c.jpg

    image.png.757893d6cd8394129b76e276919ba625.png
    since feb 20(some duplicates)

    also climo is barely different from feb 18 and 3-5 days later, no reason to think that w a pattern like this we cant get a big snowstorm

  2. 10 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

    To climo? While I guess that would be something at least...I don't see how we get to the 30 inch forecasts of some playing that game. That's gonna require one of those shots to be a MECS. No way the cities get above climo without that (unless we get like 3 moderate events).

    Would've felt more comfortable if this changed happened 1-2 weeks earlier, but you never know. While I still feel like we're kinda flirting with the last part of our usual window...thankfully it's still early...so we'll just have to patient until we get closer.

    dca is 5.9" from climo iirc, and i'm about 8-10" from climo here

    • Like 1
  3. 9 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

    We're going to go into Feb 13/14 with no snow. Global models had us below average temps/above normal precip for Jan and February, almost every run going back to September. 

    what?? did you forget about the 6-12" we got 2 weeks ago

    we are average to date right now lmaoimage.png.c49d977918f643afa978e083340febc6.png

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 2
  4.  

    7 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:


    Unironically it’s where we want it at this range. I’d even take it there 5 days to go.

    Problem I think is temps. Not sure they are workable

    its a long shot but we'll need the TPV to be just in the right spot and strong enough to where it can provide cold air but not also interfere with our storm

    or we get a 12z cmc(yesterday) type solution where the backside of it phases, we'll see what happens since tpv features are modeled horribly with long lead times

    • Like 1
  5. 1 minute ago, RandyHolt said:

    I didn't clear a spot to measure proper but I am in Rockville and it sure seems like more than 6" but I hadn't seen anyone else report over 6" until your post.  I am going 6.4" but think its still snowing here.

    ik someone in germantown who has 7-8" bc of the constant banding the entire event over there, seems like 270 was the cutoff for that last band that just moved through

    • Like 2
  6. 2 hours ago, CAPE said:

    NPAC jet extensions are more prevalent/expected in a Nino, and literally favor a +PNA. So that is NOT in and of itself the 'cause' of the warmth. The AO is neutral, and the NAO is positive. Shift those indices negative with that jet extension and we have a much more favorable/colder h5 pattern for the beginning of Feb. None of this stuff happens in isolation.

    1706659200-lMXFWRnNq1A.png

    1706659200-amvNteEXwlY.png

     

    ik - i was just talking about the pattern potentially becoming more favorable for -NAO wavebreaking (along w the +SCAND lol) w the jet extension, and mainly the pattern after the transient favorable period before mid feb

     

×
×
  • Create New...