csnavywx

Next week looks like a sloppy gyre of disappointment. Some light stuff possible around the slow-moving upper low or perhaps in association with the clipper-type shortwaves that drop in, but don't count on it. Thermals are just anemic for January. Not much quality cold air around to tap into over Canada either.

Hard not to be happy with that run. Way better than 00Z and trending the right way.

It is -- though drawing this up through BUFKIT reveals that the freezing level is down to 1700' by this point with just 25 J/kg of positive energy left. Definitely some BL issues on the front side, but not insurmountable.

Even the coastal areas can get in on the action with a low that pulls away as it starts to occlude rather than tracking up the coast. Allows the BL above the near-surface layer to cool off and let diabatic cooling do its work. Sun angle not an issue right now either (unlike a March setup).

UKMET has a storm now. Much closer to the GFS/Para/GEM camps. Still a fragile setup ofc, but marked improvement. The GEM being weaker shouldn't be surprising considering how amped and NW it was compared to its own ensembles last night.

No doubt there can be some intense banding with the type of explosive non-linear cyclogenesis this setup can produce, just warning in advance of the (likely sharp) cutoff. You're either in it or you're not type deal. One thing to watch in the globals is where the sloped f-gen zone intersects the DGZ or maxima higher in the column that can overwhelm dry layers. Sometimes, in the scenario you reference, a good indicator of misplaced banding can be teased out of looking at cross sections. We're a few days away from being able to talk about that realistically, but something to look for.

One thing to keep in mind is that given the compact nature of the shortwave being progged and the (very) large and dominant ridging to the north with a pretty hefty windfield, I would bet on a sharper northern cutoff with less of a taper. This system is less likely to feature big mixing zones and the more gradual taper-off you get with a big wrapped WCB-type configuration. Sharp R/S and S/nothing lines.

Mixed rain to snow showers possible tomorrow afternoon and early evening in tandem with the large upper low and attendant vort max. Skies will be mostly clear in the morning, allowing for some insolation under steady mid-level CAA. Should be just enough instability to kick them off. Might be a lightning strike or two with the stronger cores.

If we're going to cash in on a SSW-induced blocking pattern, it's usually a month after the event. Still a ways to go in that regard. Long range starting to show the flip to cold. But of course, we will need the southern sliders to continue.

Might be issuing on the condition that downdrafts are able to tap and bring some of the momentum from that ramping LLJ to the ground. Haven't seen any ground reports that suggest that's happening right now though. My gust spreads here have been large even in the absence of precip so far -- so it seems possible.

Still looking decent for some snow showers tomorrow for S MD and the eastern shore. Eastern shore might even fare a bit better due to some downstream Bay enhancement. 700mb temps drop wayyyy off to around -20C tomorrow with bay temps still running around 8C. Despite not particularly favorable wind fetch angles (except down the Potomac), could still see some enhancement of snow shower activity.

Still leaning strongly towards most of the best action being with narrow convective band along the front with the intense linear forcing and weak instability and then the snow showers ahead of the big mid-level vort during the day tomorrow. Post-frontal stuff will probably get shut down early by that enormous mid-level dry slot. It nearly always underperforms. The saving grace here is intense mid-level CAA ( <-20C temps at 700mb ) and good DPVA which allows for a great environment for snow showers. The tropopause height legit drops to 700mb with surface temps near freezing. Hard to find a much better environment for nice little mini-blizzard-like snow showers east of the mountains.

EPS looked better timing-wise, so that's encouraging at least.

It's possible. Wouldn't count on the post-frontal stuff on X-mas eve. Those typically underperform unless the setup is just right. However, there does seem to be a window on Xmas day proper with the big mid-level vort and very steep low-to-mid level lapse rates. Would be a snow shower type setup with 850mb temps around -15C.

Regardless of the post-frontal stuff (which I find it hard to get excited about -- post-frontal setups rarely produce much), those soundings and the position of the cold pool aloft look somewhat favorable for snow showers on Christmas Day proper. Very cold temps aloft. Might be enough weak surface-based instability to kick off some popcorn snow showers ahead of the mid-level vort.

Warm nose aloft making steady progress. Should be a pretty wide area of sleet for a while -- freezing rain where the nose gets thick enough. Haven't seen any thunder reports yet, though.

That's still snow, but not particularly efficient. Saturation cutoff is around -10C.

There's going to be a LOT of sleet with a warm nose/WCB of that strength. May also be some embedded thunder with those soundings showing a narrow ribbon of conditional upright instability getting entrained aloft.

The amount of spread in the ensembles even 24-48hr out is pretty amazing. That said, if this thing manages to stay offshore after the westward turn, it'll have a favorable period for intensification. Oh, where have we heard that one before?

The Beaufort is once again demonstrating why it is no longer a safe area to store ice, even in somewhat favorable years.

We (M and Gen Z) have precious little wealth (~4% of the total according to analysis by American Compass and others) and influence. Getting us to vote is harder partially due to the fact that many feel that they don't have a stake in the economic system and little hope for change. While I do think we'll eventually overcome that, it may take a considerable amount of time. Time we don't really have. We're just trying to hang on to survive economically and in a lot of cases -- emotionally. Case in point: Source: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6932a1.htm#suggestedcitation

Bingo. This is the heart of it right here. I am keenly interested in the reply. Oh, and no goalpost moving. You're free to change your mind based on evidence, as any good scientist should, but not the goalposts.

How many more nails do we need to drive into this UHI coffin before the zombie finally stops moving?

Yeah, the Chukchi just dropped off a cliff. Now sitting about 350 above 2012 for extent, tied on area and probably lower volume than 2012, given how hard the CAB was whacked.

That's the North Pole now. As the article states, mush up through 88N and that's what's at the pole. Safe to say that the MYI and thicker ice didn't make it through the melt season unscathed. CAB and the thickest ice took the biggest hit this year. It will be interesting to see what CryoSat shows this fall.