csnavywx

Busting out BUFKIT on this morning's guidance has been eye-opening. More to come in a bit....

1 hour ago, Wxdavis5784 said:

This aged well! This storm has me wishing I was back home in SOMD! 
best of luck guys! 

Thank you for your sacrifice, sir. We will relish every flake.

29 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I've often wondered how sci fi it really is to speculated a mega displacement event - no sense describing what is meant by THAT.

Little known ... I read or heard a story someplace - the age old cry of the rumor mill LOL, admittedly - where climate stations owned by different sovereign origins, situated out over the expanse of the Greenland ice cap - but as typically the case, are in comm's relationships with one another pretty regularly ... - all experienced an "Ice quake."  Ice quakes are not altogether that unusual, in and of themselves, but having them all experience the same description, at the same span of minutes, within the same hour, stationed 20 or 30 nautical miles apart, is either an extraordinary act of coincidence at massive scales, ...or something else was taking place.

Later that day, they started failing direction finding tech, because their coordinates were all off.  Tapping devices, giving shakes ..maybe the batts are low..etc.   Turned out, all three stations ... including the ice they were anchored upon, up and slid some 1/4 to 1/3 of a mi.  But being situated out over the open expanse, where by there is nothing to differentiate against any horizon fixtures, they were unaware this was happening, the were actually, en masse, in motion. Other than the rumble and shaking going on as they moved. 

This was later attributed to increase basal flow rates lifting and "lubricating" the glacial foundation, and it lost anchor footing temporarily and away she went.  It stopped... obviously. 

But this business with the "Dooms Day Glacier," as the press has come to denote, kinda hearkens to a similar scenario.  I haven't dug in - just on the surface so far...   Only here, the water ice that was essentially holding the land -based ice, has always preventing that. 

All the recent calving events having taken toll of the interstitial integrity of the mass "damming", ... maybe something like a catastrophic displacement nears a threshold. And the one that 'rumored' to have begun and halted one fateful day in mid summer over the vast expanse of Greenland, could take place. Only in the case of Thwaites, it doesn't halt.

I think that fear must be implicit in this, already. 

 

The eyewitness accounts from Larsen A when it disintegrated were pretty eye opening. It went fast, as did B. C is looking a bit less healthy nowadays.

As for Thwaites, losing that shelf in the next decade would set up some pretty bad news for mid-century. There's not much to keep that mass from moving at an increasingly faster clip once the plug is degraded.

9 minutes ago, H2O said:

Silver bells lining:  At least the warmest temps are centered over the plains.  

Rolling it forward to Jan/Feb is "weenie suicide" territory. Your meme game is gonna have to be sharp.

Happy for those seeing flakes or pellets today. Enjoy it, because big ooof:

On 11/6/2021 at 9:36 AM, chubbs said:

Where's Blizz? Torchy recently considering the enso state.  We should get some nina-related cooling this winter. Guessing we will be even warmer next fall, if the nina relaxes. We'll see.

Blizz posts are usually a good, contrarian indicator and a solid sign we've hit bottom on a short-term trend.

9 hours ago, pazzo83 said:

DCA hit 80F again.  Endless summer continues.

If you believe the CFS weeklies and NMME monthlies, there's a lot more where that came from. Very little snowcover build over NA this month and our source region for cold air remains quite warm, so even the cooldowns will be more of a reversion closer to the mean rather than any significant negative departures.

It's just you. Plenty of banding still around 80% of the core.

Annulars generally require marginal SSTs and light east-southeast shear to offset beta shear. That helps strip banding and forces the vortex upright.

Top-heavy nature of the CAPE tomorrow and low-level capping means updrafts might initially struggle in a relatively anemic cumulus field, but once the cap weakens sufficiently, it should take off pretty quickly. Little warm-sector cloudiness to speak of (other than a bit of acu or accas). Abnormally large proportion of the instability is above the freezing level (for these parts). Coming up with 0.5-0.75" on the hail forecasting diagram, though could easily breach 1" with some assist from mid-level rotation in individual cells. Gusts likely to be 35-45kt widespread, especially if a small LEWP or two gets started. Lightning might end up being some of the best and most intense of the season for some areas, especially closer to the Bay.

14 minutes ago, tiger_deF said:

Sam's really been shedding the bands. Do we think this is just a temporary pulse down or maybe the beginning of some kind of annular transition?

No, annular hurricanes generally require marginal SSTs and light southeasterly shear. Sam has neither nor is expected to have either.

On 9/11/2021 at 8:49 PM, OSUmetstud said:

The winds here were probably like a 1 in 10 to 20 year event. We gusted to 85 knots in a March 2017 low that was 952mb or so and came up the same bay as Larry and that was strongest wind gust here in 40 years. It's the second highest gust for a TC here on record behind Ione in 1955. Far more damage than the March 2017 windstorm though. Probably second behind our snowmaggeden super blizzard in Jan 2019 in terms of anomaly and overall impact. 

Wow, that's pretty gnarly then. Wasn't immediately obvious that it was going to be quite that bad up there -- but the radar structure on landfall was still pretty tropical in appearance with a partially intact eyewall.

7 hours ago, OSUmetstud said:

The surge on Placentia Bay (about 5 ft or so above high tide) might be one of the most impressive aspects of Larry. 

How was it up there -- as compared to say a strong mid-winter cyclone?

Just now, MN Transplant said:

Did we lose the anemometer at MSY?

After looking at the METAR list, it sure looks like it.

I see the MSY wind sensor got knocked out. Ugh, not great.

Starting to get real in NOLA:

METAR: KMSY 292240Z AUTO 09054G72KT 1/4SM +RA OVC012 25/ A2905 RMK AO2 PK WND 08076/2208 LTG DSNT S PRESFR P0023 T0250 RVRNO $

The breakdown of the vortex rossby waves in the eyewall over the past 30 minutes is like something out of a textbook. Also waves propagating out from the center into the rainbands (obvious from radar loop).

Yeah, I was premature on the bank call. Either wobbling or getting some frictional torqueing as it interacts with the coastal interface -- but whatever it is, we'll take it.  

Yeah, cam is tilted now, but somehow still up.

Can't be sure yet -- but she looks to be banking slightly right relative to earlier. Might be the start of the turn.

Saw that cooler and other trash.

Sherriff of Grand Isle on the phone on TWC said their sensor reached 148mph (prob a gust) before breaking.

3 minutes ago, purduewx80 said:

That is most definitely not how you read that. It's the altimeter, which was 29.22" or around 989.5mb. Looks like he deleted both tweets fortunately. 

That's what I thought too -- but he clipped the GIF version instead of the flash version of ADDS, which indeed uses whole integer numbers for SLP (the flash version uses the tenths, like in METARs). Still, the lowest I can find from the station's METAR record is:

KCYD 291035Z AUTO 1/4SM -RA FG OVC004 27/26 A2809 RMK A02 P0002 T02710260

Which is about 951mb. The issue is that the station didn't report an altimeter for 90m prior to that and it was on the way up -- so we don't really know.

10 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

Was wondering why there was so little precip on the NW side then saw this thread. Wonder if this will impact rainfall forecasts inland?

 

Shear vector is out of the WNW. Only around 8-12kt, but that's enough to place more of the precip on the E/SE side of the circulation.

1 minute ago, OSUmetstud said:

I think that's fairly normal in the strongest, right? The flight level winds and surface winds are close with the big max in between. 

At least some of them from my recollection, yeah. I recall reading some papers on those two in particular and how normal FL wind reduction to the surface wasn't always appropriate. 

Acting like Dean and Mitch with these wind profiles. Max warm core strength closer to the surface.

1 minute ago, mempho said:

They said "little to no storm surge flooding expected" and that forecast was based on rapid intensification.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

Yes, it was. Around 105-115 max intensity. We're going to clear that in terms of max w and radii, which will have an impact on those initial numbers. The levees will likely hold, which is why I said "risk". Additional strengthening will not help though and the increase in risk is not linear.