Jump to content

McHenrySnow

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by McHenrySnow

  1. Their harassment started long before my tag, but thanks for the input.
  2. Be prepared to be piled on, but you’re used to it, I know.
  3. He said no models substantiated what I had said and that was not true. ive acknowledged a good trend, I’m just being cautious. I’m sorry I can’t lend myself to weenie forecasting that suits you.
  4. There is a concern with shear and unlike lake and cook, inland counties won’t benefit much if at all from the lake. There is absolutely nothing wrong about this statement.
  5. Am I writing in a foreign language? Or do you guys not bother to read. Where did I say I’m choosing one model over the other. I’ve repeatedly said my expectations have increased and I’m not worried about getting completely shafted like I once was.
  6. You must be unaware of the NAM or RGEM. You must also have poor reading comprehension as I have repeated acknowledged trends are looking better. I’m not responding to you from here on out, you’re a troll.
  7. Rockford almost always manages to do well no matter. Several models show a lower area of totals over Boone and McHenry due to the low shearing out and then the lake compensating for Lake and Cook. I’d be very happy with 6”, and, as I said, I’m becoming cautiously optimistic.
  8. Cautiously optimistic. Believe me, I would love to be proven wrong and northern LOT counties get at least 6", but I'm not sold. Lake County has the best shot, of course, thanks to lake enhancement/effect. I'd feel more comfortable if I lived 30 miles south.
  9. Oh, that was a nightmare. Please don't ever speak of it again! ha
  10. I graduated with Kluber. We lived on the same hall in our freshmen dorm and were pretty good friends.
  11. This has only been one-sided the entire time. Hope you got your rocks off now.
  12. I have no desire to participate in AngrySummons-type antics.
  13. I'm going to have to have a chat with Ricky. That is not good news. (next storm, I know)
  14. Hard to bet against a storm slamming Iowa this winter.
  15. Agreed, though slightly further north. Chicago is definitely still in this, imo.
  16. That's fresh coming from you, but I agree, there's no reason to continue attacking posters simply because you disagree with their thoughts.
  17. I don't recall the GFS looking that great for the northern tier counties either. I have a job so I can't constantly follow your posts, forgive me.
  18. I'm not sure what your problem is, but yes, the Ukie is another strike against the far northern tier counties.
  19. I've learned not to get my hopes up. It's served me well.
  20. Oh, yes, NAM certainly doesn't factor into my thoughts at all at this point. Writing has been on the wall for the far northern tier. Even LOT agrees, they removed the likely wording from our forecast.
×
×
  • Create New...