Jump to content

Ahoff

Members
  • Posts

    2,642
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ahoff

  1. Possibly pretty good on the dew point, official observation was 70.
  2. Well, it is usually spot on with the high temperatures. It runs a little ahead of the official updates, but showed the correct temperatures yesterday.
  3. It's been rather weird, as the data says our highs are getting higher, but our yearly maxes do not seem to be. Obviously that is showing there is an increase in our humidity over the past few decades, it is still weird that the gap between average high and highest high is shrinking.
  4. Yeah, that's what I was saying earlier, that type of situation is not out of the realm of possibility. While I wouldn't think 110 is in play (which is just too much), 105-107 could be on the table in the future.
  5. I'd doubt it, but you never know. Who'd have thought the NW would get where they are?
  6. Looks like it, will be interesting. Although these numbers seem like nothing compared to the NW.
  7. Up to 81 already before 9:30. Haven't seen a cloud yet either.
  8. Yes, I was going to bring it back and say it aged poorly, but good thing you’re here, lol. Anyway, was a rare overachiever today, 91.
  9. My app has KPIT at 91, so it should have at least hit 90.
  10. Officially 88, and tied for the warmest day, barring anything crazy, this should end up as the first 90 degree day. My weather app, that I have for KPIT, has hit 90, so we'll see if that is accurate.
  11. Interesting, as we're at 82 already (from the weather app centered on KPIT), which seems like a decent temperature to potentially hit 90 later. I'd like to see it at 86 around noon to feel a little more confident in 90.
  12. I mean probably, but even the NWS does this too. And it's just a very strange phenomena that drives me nuts. It's kind of like when we are forecast to stay all snow and mix and rain stays south and almost every time without fail, we switch over (however, this winter was not that issue).
  13. I definitely feel we under perform when we are forecast to hit 90. Lower temperature forecasts are overshot many times, but 90, even with model support, atmospheric support, and forecast support is undershot way more often, despite areas all around reaching and exceeding that number. That’s my point.
  14. Right, so stopping at 88-89 is more common. I believe that's basically what I said earlier. My initial point was underachieving on days forecast to hit the 90s is very typical. We rarely overachieve and hit 92 on those days, for example, or hit 90 when we are forecasted for upper 80s. Just seems weird that other areas seem to overachieve more often than we do. At least it seems that way.
  15. That's just one year though. Look at 2019, 3 90 degree days, 10 at 88/89. I'd bet if you averaged it out 88-89 has more days than 90s. Plus, looking at last year when looking at the 88/89 days that's based on two temperatures, while we reached 5 different temperatures in the 90s (90, 91, 92, 93 and 94). So, thirteen days reached two different temperatures and 17 days reached five different temperatures. I'd say 88/89 is more common.
  16. But this is typical, we should expect 88-89 the next two days. Anything higher is an overachiever in my books.
  17. Still, it's a struggle for our area to climb to the 90s no matter how supportive the airmass, but it will be interesting to see. Hit 88 today, still the warmest of the year.
  18. Yeah, I'm skeptical of 90 over the next few days, but we are close.
×
×
  • Create New...