Jump to content

Malacka11

Members
  • Posts

    2,079
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Malacka11

  1. 12 minutes ago, StormChaser4Life said:

    I think you will regret that instantly. Try for a polar plunge or a snow angel. Lol. I'm definitely going to do the infamous boiling water to ice crystals. Sorry to get off topic

    Hey... That's actually a great idea! I've seen so many videos of it but doing it myself would be something else. As long as I don't scald my a** in the process. 

    • Haha 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, StormChaser4Life said:

    Yea we are a long ways from knowing where this is going to track. Gfs being gfs bouncing all over. I feel I80 north will be the jackpot for this. Just a hunch. But I seen time and time again where these trend south in time but this isn't solely a clipper and more of a hybrid so hard to say

    CMC remains steadfast south. 

  3. 5 minutes ago, mimillman said:

    I feel pretty good about this one for the Chicago metro. A bit unnerving the northern shifts in this afternoons guidance, but as we saw with the last two systems, south trend inside 72 hours is the way to go

    I concur. Besides, the northward shift isn't universal (right? lol). IIRC, the FV3 was actually to our south with the heaviest snow. I think we're looking as good as any city for now. 

    • Like 1
  4. 3 hours ago, Baum said:

    With all due respect you had a prof met who works for the NWS out of LOT and within shouting distance of your location say he 's hoping for 4-6" and your talking about a shut out...the negativity is over the top sometimes. It may bust. It happens. But after tracking for 5 days and throwing in the towel as it commences without support is uncalled for. I'm guessing you'll fall into the 3"-6" window.

    I think you may have misunderstood my post, which I take blame for. I meant "temporary shutout" as in like a fifteen-minute period with no snow in it, NOT that it wouldn't snow at all anymore. I wasn't really trying to be negative at all; I was merely commenting on the fact that at that time, I was outside of the radar-indicated snow zone but it was still snowing, and that it might cease snowing any minute. Again, retrospectively, I see that my original comment was worded like sh*t, so my bad for the misunderstanding.

    • Like 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

    03z HRRR brought the better band a bit farther south in the LOT cwa.

    On another note, Indy really looks like it's going to struggle with waa for a prolonged period of time.  

    I still have a hard time believing that Aurora will see more than 4-5 inches... but I'll take it.

  6. Just now, UMB WX said:

    Thought we could baby step a bit better than that on the GFS tonight. 

    Yep. Tonight, the baby sat instead of stepping. Oh well, I think we can all agree that tomorrow is the day things start getting serious. At least the GFS didn't trend worse again. 

    • Like 2
  7. Just now, ChiTownSnow said:

    if i recall correctly, GHD1 did this exact same thing about this far out.  hopefully its a sign :}

    Got a question: (I really didn't track weather much until like 2014 maybe, so I have fairly little recollection of GHD 1 other than it being awesome once the snow started) at roughly what point did it become apparent with GHD 1 that 20"+ amounts were possible? Was it feasible from the start? Or did become a trend later on? Also, did the storm shift to its actualized area of effect shortly before the day it hit or was N IL always the jackpot zone?

    'Pologies for the off-topic comment. 

×
×
  • Create New...