Jump to content

NEG NAO

Members
  • Posts

    6,930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NEG NAO

  1. 4 minutes ago, SBUWX23 said:

    The GFS continues to show less phasing and less favorable northern and southern stream spacing to lift the low further north like earlier runs. We should not be looking at snow clown maps now as they are just not good but rather what is going on aloft. Will see what the other guidance has, but the GFS may not be completely wrong with the scraper for us. Again i would not put stock in its ptype or snow amount at all. It has a cold bias 

    you talking about the 13th system or the Presidents Day system ?

  2. 10 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

    CMC is a lot weaker with the low and with the mild prior airmass, looks like a lot of white rain or just rain. We’d need a dynamic setup like the GFS to really snow and accumulate unless you’re inland and probably elevated. 

    the biggest obstacle to snowfall in the metro with this system is there is no established cold air in place prior to arrival of the storm and you have to be far inland and higher elevation

    • Like 2
  3. 4 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

    If the confluence is real and we can develop the low quickly as it goes to our south it should snow. Question would be how much is wasted on the front end due to the marginal airmass or otherwise if we struggle to get to 32. But I wouldn’t jump on any snowy solution unless other models jump on board and we hold that solution for at least 24 hours. We’ve seen time and again these lows especially southern stream trend north at the end and confluence weaken. 

    GFS is total nonsense

    gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_22.png

  4. 24 minutes ago, TJW014 said:

    16th/17th and beyond have more of my interest. Cold air will finally be funneling in with the 16th/17th possible event which could give us some minor accumulations, but really sets us up for something to tap into should something develop in the longer run. With our luck it'll just be wasted cold air

    that makes sense since minor accumulations is the norm in NYC the last 2 years so maybe they can make it to 4 or 5 inches total for the season so far....

  5. 30 minutes ago, cleetussnow said:

    I don’ think we’ll have clarity 4 days out on this one.  I think model runs will be all over until gametime.  We have to careful not to bite on any particular one, but we are getting three or four runs per day that are closer.  Maybe there will be something later to latch onto if this one doesn't’ work out.

    like this

    image.thumb.png.23236c943d55ae6f59d5c1a25be24c28.png

    or like this one

    image.thumb.png.e2761bae8d27eb55c3e5da06639a003a.png

    Only the 0Z and 12Z runs should be taken seriously since they contain new Radiosonde Data which is a very important data input into these models 6Z and 18Z contain old stale data

    • Thanks 1
  6. 1 hour ago, LibertyBell said:

    Why is the enthusiasm so low though?

    Is everyone taking a wait and see approach?

    Looking to see how much multimodel support there is for this.

    because when we see this not much to get enthused about because it isn't correct and other models at 0Z were wet

    gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_neus_22.png

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
  7. Just now, Snowlover11 said:

    GFS hit

    Ukie just north

    euro way north

    talking nyc proper.

    when the worst model is the only hit - time to start looking down the road for other possibilities which there are none as of now - Presidents Day is too far away and the EURO the day before 2/18 does not look impressive

    prateptype_cat_ecmwf-imp.conus.png

    • Haha 2
    • Confused 1
×
×
  • Create New...