Jump to content

Greg

Members
  • Posts

    1,775
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Greg

  1. 33 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

    So given the paste, is this the more realistic clown?

    snku_acc-imp.us_ne.png

    No, it's not that realistic. Use the 10:1 ratio. It's more realistic and easier to correct for. The only way that clown map gets closer to reality is if and only if the storm comes closer and the omega can get that far north. The heaviest still appears to be in far Southern New Hampshire and off to the south in Eastern Mass. Yes, there will be some elevation enhancement on the eastern facing Worcester hills and southern Berks. This is looking like a colder storm now with the high to the north not moving away as quickly as though much earlier and the track is now a tic or two south and offshore.

  2. 1 minute ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

    The constant weenie overanalyzing is amusing but I understand for certain areas.  This had basically been a 6” storm for Greenfield since Monday.

    Perhaps, but there are people that exist on the board and other viewers that need to understand why certain things occur/happen or unfold the way they do.

    • Like 1
  3. 8 minutes ago, NorEastermass128 said:

    TV Mets very underwhelming for the coast. 1-3ish for most. I think they bust too low at least on the north shore. 

    The problem here is the main low and trailing short wave are not hooking up quite as well as we want to get a well-developed ccb and once again a fleeting high vs a building high is to the north/northeast of us. If the high was coming in just now to start to build the cold and the storm approached on late Saturday through Sunday afternoon with a decent phase/CCB and a true Benchmark track, then we'd be talking a much better scenario here.

  4. 1 minute ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

    Big implications here too. The models got that CCB cranking in time here at 12z, let’s see if it holds later.

    thats going to be the difference between 2-3” of slop or 8-9” of paste.

    For you, an earlier phase and slightly south track will give you a definitely better result. As stated, 2-3 inches of pure glop or 7-8 inches of heavy wet snow.

  5. 1 minute ago, JoeSnowBOS said:


    EURO becoming less of a tool to use given we are close to game time. Can still use but short range models to me are best at this point


    .

    Depends on one's preference. I can still use medium/long-range models up to 24 hours before direct onset of snow. They are still actually fairly reliable. Then of course, I start looking at short range models such as you do.

    • Like 1
  6. 1 minute ago, Layman said:

    What's the likelihood my area actually sees 12-18"?

    While prior results don't equal future performance, my guess is likely 6-10" based on my recency-biased, winter-storm PTSD cynical perspective.  

    Seriously, the translation there is actually 12-13" is more likely then 18 in that range. Take the lower amounts of those ranges and the map then seems reasonable.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...