Jump to content

psv88

Members
  • Posts

    15,656
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by psv88

  1. 1 minute ago, LibertyBell said:

    Yep 91 here too, heat on the south shore is very underrated, the temperatures rise much faster here than they do on the Arctic North Shore (especially up until 1 or 2 pm.)

    No. It just depends on the wind direction. Today the wind has a northerly component so the south shore will heat up faster. But by mid afternoon that will change. 

  2. 3 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

    I don't believe today's light rainfall (0.10" at NYC, 0.08" at LGA and JFK, and 0.06" at Newark) will have much impact on Tuesday's high temperatures. Looking back at Central Park's long record, there were 6 100° days two days after measurable precipitation. In fact, on July 20, 1977, 0.06" rain fell. July 21, 1977 saw the mercury hit 104°. 

    The most precipitation that fell two days before a 100° high was 0.36"; the most precipitation that fell one day before a 100° high was 0.16".

    The highest temperature two days after 1" or more rain was 99°; the highest temperature one day after 1" or more rain was 97°. 

    The highest temperature two days after 2" or more rain was 95°; the highest temperature one day after 1" or more rain was 93°. Both those cases followed 3" or above rainfall.

    The highest temperature two days after 4" or more rain was 89°; the highest temperature one day after 4" or more rain was 87°. 

    In short, heavier rainfall would have an impact. The light rainfall that occurred today shouldn't have much impact. The development of a sea breeze, cloud cover, and/or humidity will have a larger impact.

    Great stats Don, thanks 

  3. Just now, Picard said:

    Well they had it half right, it got very sticky and warm here in the late afternoon - standing over the grill was brutal.  Weather station read a 101 heat index around 5:30 pm with a dewpoint of 78.

    Correct. Temps verified east of the city but maybe not west and southwest. The rain and wind forecast was horrendous 

    • Like 1
  4. 9 minutes ago, SACRUS said:

     

    Highs

    Clouds in the way  for most of the day with a decent comeback later in the PM 

     

    EWR: 92
    ISP: 91
    JFK: 91
    TEB: 91
    LGA: 90
    ACY: 90
    New Brnswck: 88
    BLM: 88
    NYC: 88
    PHL: 88
    TTN: 87

    90 here. My forecast high was 91 for today. Not a huge bust…

    the winds were under forecast big time. Took the boat out and it was blowing 25-30 mph, got soaked. They did slacken in the evening, but it was really blowing earlier 

    • Like 1
  5. 39 minutes ago, Rjay said:

    As of 10am

    Isp 82

    Frg 80

    Fox 81

    Jfk 82

    Ewr 82

    Teb 81

    Smq 81

    Lga 79 (ne wind)

    Jones fricken Beach 81

    Mtp 79

    NYC 78....

     

     

    Alot of my friends are headed to the city today to escape the heat. They were thinking about the beach but decided to go to midtown 

    • Haha 2
  6. 16 minutes ago, Wxoutlooksblog said:

    As a strong believer in climate change and global warming I think this is ridiculous and outrageous. There have been heatwaves going way back. By allowing yourself to rate climate change according to the weather on a day or two you are promoting the ability of deniers to come back when it snows or is cold for a day or two and say, "see there's no climate change". It's absurd and it is NOT what climate change is. It is far bigger and based on statistics globally over 100s of years. It is not a hot day or a snowstorm.

    WX/PT

    Liberty gonna Liberty

    • Haha 3
×
×
  • Create New...