Jump to content

psv88

Members
  • Posts

    16,519
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by psv88

  1. 3 minutes ago, Krs4Lfe said:

    Euro has completely nothing. Even more strung out and positively tilted.

     

    GFS-AI and Euro AI show light snowfall for most with moderate totals out east and northeast

    CMC has light-moderate snow too. 

     

    Which camp do we follow: AI models and CMC? 

    or everything else ?

    This threat is done. Time to move on. Enjoy the light snows on Saturday.

    • Disagree 1
  2. 1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

    Bridgeport, Islip, Central Park, JFK Airport, LaGuardia Airport, and White Plains all had highs of 41F (5.0C) today. If that holds, it would be the first time since November 21, 1998 that all six locations had identical high temperatures. 

    I also recorded a high of 41. Great day to calibrate those weather stations. 

    • Like 2
  3. 2 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

    If the forecast holds the warm up would have lasted 9 days. The 6th through the 14th. 

    Not at all. 

    The warm up started on 1/4. 

    From my point and click. 

    1/15 - 43

    1/16-34

    1/17 - 40

    1/18 - 36

    Highs 36-43 are within the normal range for mid-January. So if we cool down on 1/19 as currently forecasted, the warm up was 1/4 to 1/18

  4. 2 minutes ago, eduggs said:

    If he says something incorrect and continues to insist that he is correct, I will challenge it right here. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he's wrong. Either way, anybody reading can learn. If I had no respect for him, I would ignore it. People need to know what's true and what's not. 

    Again, you are making yourself look foolish. Nobody cares at all. Take it off line. 

    The way you challenge comes across as disrespectful. I respect Don immensely, as does everyone else on here. 

    Again, take it to DM and move forward. Nobody, and i mean nobody, cares about the equations he uses in his posts. You just come across as a pompous prick. 

    Your aggressive and disrespectful posts will drive one of our best posters away from the board. 

    • Like 3
    • 100% 1
  5. 22 minutes ago, eduggs said:

    Some of us know what a sensitivity analysis is. And for those who do not, your link is helpful. But what you present is not a sensitivity analysis. Or maybe you are withholding most of it, which should include:
    - which inputs you used in your analysis
    - how they were perturbed
    - how the output (mean temp) varied with those perturbations
    - ranking of influential variables

    The goal of a sensitivity analysis in to determine which variables have the biggest impact on some output... not just what is the most likely output. And if the variables, assumptions, and their tested ranges aren't included, the output is kind of meaningless.
     

    Take this to DMs. If you want this information from Don, I am sure he will give it to you. 

    Further, show the man some respect. He contributes alot to this board and for many years. Your attitude towards him is not called for. 

    Seriously, nobody cares about your picking apart his statistical analysis. You may think it makes you look smart, but it makes you seem like an asshole. This is not a college course, its a weather board. Give it a rest. 

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 2
    • 100% 2
  6. 11 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

    Its not going to be a La Nina come February.

    Sorry pal. We had a great December. We’ll probably sneak in a nice event late January and then face a more hostile pattern the rest of winter.

    i think the park ends with around 24” of snow. I don’t see it going much more than that 

  7. This thaw has changed the feeling of winter. Feels like it’s going to be seen as a front loaded winter where most of the cold was in December. January seems to be pretty warm until the last week. La Nina’s suck in February so we may just scrape ourselves to an average season. More than that I don’t see

×
×
  • Create New...