Jump to content

Hoosier

NO ACCESS TO PR/OT
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    47,183

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Hoosier

  1. Hoosier
    I wonder what their total would be right now if they didn't have Lake Michigan upwind. Probably be in the same boat as me... i.e. ~9"
  2. Hoosier
    Nobody's gonna feel sorry when you're near 47 inches.
  3. Hoosier
    That's a good assumption. I can clearly remember some days that produced less around downtown than ORD, and there hasn't really been a lake enhanced event of any significance to make up for that.
  4. Hoosier
    Exactly I guess I'll clarify my other post. I do think it's not out of the question for this to produce at least 6" somewhere, but it would require that it's not a strung out piece of garbage to the tune of the 18z NAM. And in that case, the main snow band would likely end up north of Chicago.
  5. Hoosier
    I'm not sure there is a feasible way for this to be a 6+ storm in the area. The trough is so positive tilt, which can produce a good snow sometimes, but this is also pretty progressive overall.
  6. Hoosier
    Did you see the UKMET? Go start that thread... Chicago gon reel her in
  7. Hoosier
    This was a pretty wild swing back to back
  8. Hoosier
    Gotta admit I lol'd at that little montage you put together.
  9. Hoosier
    Over/under on ORD snow amount: 1.35"
  10. Hoosier
    It's 54/5 at Indianapolis. That dewpoint seems low compared to surrounding obs so not sure if it's erroneous but in any case, pretty dry airmass.
  11. Hoosier
    I bet that wouldn't even be 2" in Chicago. Mild temps/warm ground leading in would eat away at some of the accumulation in the absence of good rates.
  12. Hoosier
    lol
  13. Hoosier
    There's your thread the needle for Chicago. Weak ass, but a thread the needle nonetheless.
  14. Hoosier
    Canadian probably went too extreme in the other direction.
  15. Hoosier
    It can only snow 5.7" the rest of the way to get onto the sub 20" list. 9.8" 1920-21 11.5" 1921-22 12.0" 1936-37 14.3" 1948-49 18.0" 1898-99 18.9" 1924-25 19.0" 1901-02 19.0" 1914-15 19.1" 1912-13 19.8" 2011-12
  16. Hoosier
    Bank clock?
  17. Hoosier
    It's almost unfathomable that I'm going to get through mid February without reaching double digit snowfall. That is very impressive for someone at this latitude who also has Lake Michigan only several miles away. I'm not in the snowbelt, but getting some lake enhancement/lake effect from time to time is not unheard of by any means.
  18. Hoosier
    Physically relocate Chicago to central Wisconsin.
  19. Hoosier
    One thing this setup has going for it (among others) is the lead system that passes by midweek serves to kickstart the moisture return process from the GOM. The cold front with that lead system may only settle down into the central parts of IL/IN/OH. We are still limited by time of year, so don't expect outrageous dews too far north, but this particular evolution with the preceding system means they will be higher than they otherwise would've been.
  20. Hoosier
    Agreed. It will be brutal for you when I bump it.
  21. Hoosier
    It's impressive to see a day 6 risk area outlooked into southern Indiana, given the usual reluctance of SPC to place a day 6 (or even day 4-5) risk area in this sub at this time of year.
  22. Hoosier
    The CFS from that site did well with flagging our warmth in the month of January.
  23. Hoosier
  24. Hoosier
    I know which one has a better shot at verifying.
  25. Hoosier
    That's more of a problem for long-lasting snow retention or when rates are too light. Heavy enough rates will overcome the sun angle in March, April, and even May if it were to snow hard enough.
×
×
  • Create New...