cutlew

Members
  • Content Count

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About cutlew

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    KMDW
  • Location:
    Chicago (Bridgeport)

Recent Profile Visitors

301 profile views
  1. MD student here - I think based on the data we have so far and what we know about related vaccines (e.g. influenza, for which very few people wear masks to avoid infection) that the vaccinated individual in your scenario would still receive some degree of protection. I think it’s a fair analogy to picture the vaccine as having a net effect of reducing the exposed viral load - i.e. even if immune cells ultimately can’t fully neutralize a high exposure they should still be able to clear a certain amount of the virus. So if we can assume that exposed viral load corresponds to eventual severity of disease (obvi not a perfect assumption but seems pretty well-supported by existing data), then of course vaccine+mask is more protective than vaccine alone, but even vaccine alone should be more protective than no vaccination at all. This is probably the reason why - even as capacity limits, etc are being lifted - wearing a mask in general settings where you don’t know who is/isn’t immune will continue to be recommended while COVID is still circulating. Because as you mentioned, all of this very promising data is in the context of mask-wearing and other precautions, and the vaccines might appear to be less effective in the absence of those other actions.
  2. Seems like this NHL player should be exhibit A against that argument. https://www.buffalohockeybeat.com/sabres-rasmus-ristolainen-reveals-difficult-battle-with-covid-19/ Whether your chance of dying or falling severely ill is 50% or 0.5% to start with, it blows my mind that a couple hours of headache and arm soreness wouldn’t be worth reducing that chance by 95%. Or isn’t worth the additional 95% protection to your grandmother who has COPD, or your co-worker who has diabetes, or your grocery store clerk who has an immune condition.
  3. That MDW value has to be near/in the top 5 all-time no? By my personal tally the city proper has received more than 40” of snow in the last 22 days; official ORD total is a smidge over 36” for that time frame.
  4. Enjoying the bright blue sun and -5 wind chills but gotta imagine that lake band will slide down and push the immediate lakefront over 20" total later today
  5. That lake effect band did not disappoint, 8" after 10 pm last night (per measurement pic on my car after I cleaned it off) to bring it to ~15" storm total here. Who would've imagined after the first 1-footer in 6 years that we'd get another one two weeks later
  6. Sitting just a few miles east of the Alek-MDW death band, “only” up to ~6” total as of 8 pm. Still inch per hour since 5. Looking out my window, traffic on the Stevenson is the 20 mph, driving with flashers-on type of scenario right now
  7. Yeah it looked like the second band might keep coming but it sagged south of me even, oh well it'll be back soon I hope!
  8. Back to SN here in the secondary "band" overspreading the south side, plus can already see KLOT radar filling in from the south, gonna be a good day
  9. At 3" as of 10 AM here, 1.8" in about 75 minutes of the LES band that pushed through
  10. All three HRW's at 12Z are over 15" for the city proper, pretty nuts
  11. Not often you see the LES band perfectly curl as it comes onshore to cover the entire geographical area of the city of Chicago
  12. The view down Halsted right now, went from flurries to SN/SN+ in 20 minutes
  13. And leaves us in between in the city to fight for the scraps /s would happily lock in 12”
  14. @RCNYILWX and the other Mets who contribute to this forum
  15. It really did, could’ve sworn it was 10 degrees colder and just a much crisper feel to the air once the sun came out vs. a few hours earlier