Roger Smith Posted December 17 Author Share Posted December 17 Tracking anomalies and projected end of month ... _____________________________ DCA _NYC _BOS __ORD _ATL _IAH ___DEN _PHX _SEA _____ (anom 1-16) __________ -9.2 _ -8.7 _ -7.7 __-10.7 _-4.9 _-3.2 __+8.3 _ +5.1 _ +6.4 _____ (p anom 1-31) ________ -5.0 _ -4.5 _ -4.0 __-6.0 _-2.5 _-1.0 __+6.0 _ +3.5 _ +2.5 (17th) _ A more variable regime will cut into large negative anomalies in eastern and central regions. It will stay generally mild in the western regions but SEA will have a larger reversal as arctic air builds in for a while later in the month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PositiveEPOEnjoyer Posted December 18 Share Posted December 18 6 hours ago, Roger Smith said: Tracking anomalies and projected end of month ... _____________________________ DCA _NYC _BOS __ORD _ATL _IAH ___DEN _PHX _SEA _____ (anom 1-16) __________ -9.2 _ -8.7 _ -7.7 __-10.7 _-4.9 _-3.2 __+8.3 _ +5.1 _ +6.4 _____ (p anom 1-31) ________ -5.0 _ -4.5 _ -4.0 __-6.0 _-2.5 _-1.0 __+6.0 _ +3.5 _ +2.5 (17th) _ A more variable regime will cut into large negative anomalies in eastern and central regions. It will stay generally mild in the western regions but SEA will have a larger reversal as arctic air builds in for a while later in the month. No chance ORD finishes at -6. Something like -3 or so is more likely to be the final departure, maybe even -2 if we get a few super warm days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so_whats_happening Posted December 24 Share Posted December 24 Man went for a warmer BOS than anticipated. Also the lack of a break in the warmth out west a bit of a surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted Saturday at 08:37 AM Author Share Posted Saturday at 08:37 AM Yes, Edmonton Alberta is running 12 F below normal (7 C below) but that colder regime has stayed locked into central Canada most of the last week to ten days. It hasn't even been below average here near the US border. Just a general note to all participants, I will open up a thread for 2026 contest forecasts and see how that goes, perhaps we will continue on, and perhaps not. Depends on level of interest, it's easy enough for me to keep doing what I normally do but at the same time, I don't want people to enter out of anything other than an enthusiasm for tackling the challenge. So if anyone happens to post Jan 2026 forecasts after this post, I will move them over to the new thread which will be open almost as soon as I post this. Happy new year, I am not going to post any preliminary scoring for December, we will let the results be a total surprise on January 1st or 2nd. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted yesterday at 12:11 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:11 AM As I was told, ORD did not stay that close to -6 F above normal but they didn't get into the real core of that crazy warmth that is now about to get the boot east ... it has played havoc with my ATL and IAH estimates and DEN has stayed well above +10 just turning cold yesterday. Think the final values now look like being around -5.0 _ -5.0 _ -5.0 __ -4.0 _ +1.5 _ +4.0 ___ +10.0 _ +6.0 _ +3.5 will present some preliminary scoring on that basis, going to need to figure out max-60 mercy rule scoring for the western locations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted yesterday at 01:22 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 01:22 AM Preliminary scoring for December 2025 (version 1, raw scores only) _ note for raw scores in anomalies greater than +5 or -5, error deductions are 1 pt per 0.1 error in range 5.0 to actual, and raw scores are no lower than 0.1 per correct-sign predicted 0.1 deg. When an anomaly exceeds 10.0, scores are then based on a proportional basis, for example, a +5.5 forecast against an +11.0 outcome scores 50 (raw). As another example, a forecast of +0.7 scores 07 if that is higher than the raw score would otherwise be. ... then a max-60 rule is invoked if no raw score is above 60. These max 60 scores are generally in equal increments from zero to 60, adjusted by fairness considerations when compared to the spread of raw scores. I have some objective rules that I try to apply to that adjustment but with contest results perhaps depending on exactly what the details will be (you can see DEN, PHX scores and possibly IAH will need adjustments), I will just give you the raw scores now and will be working out how adjustments affect the overall annual outcome. No idea in advance what that's going to look like (although I can't see potential for outcome to be changed by the max-60 adjustments) ... <<< Raw scores only >>> FORECASTER _____________ DCA_NYC_BOS _ east _ ORD_ATL_IAH _ cent _ c/e_ DEN_PHX_SEA_west_TOT Mercurial ______________________ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000 _ 30 _ 80 _ 60_ 170 _170_ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000__ 180 hudsonvalley21 ________________ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000 _ 52 _ 96 _ 50_ 198 _198_ 04 _ 26 _ 24 _054__ 252 Scotty Lightning _______________ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000 _ 40 _ 80 _ 40_ 160 _160_ 10 _ 10 _ 40 _060__ 220 ____ Normal ____________________00 _ 00 _ 00 _000 _ 20 _ 70 _ 20 _ 110 _110__ 00 _ 00 _ 30 _030__ 140 wxallannj ______________________ 20 _ 22 _ 26 _068 _ 34 _ 86 _ 54 _174 _242 _ 20 _ 34 _ 80 _134__ 376 DonSutherland1 ________________20 _ 40 _ 40 _100 _ 86 _ 80 _ 52 _218 _318 _ 14 _ 12 _ 32 _058 __ 376 BKViking _______________________24 _ 26 _ 34 _084 _ 54 _ 88 _ 44 _186 _270 _ 13 _ 34 _ 60 _107 __ 377 ___ Consensus ________________26 _ 34 _ 36 _ 096 _76 _ 86 _ 42 _204 _300_ 10 _ 20 _ 40 _070__370 so_whats_happening __________ 28 _ 26 _ 32 _084 _ 72 _ 86 _ 44 _202 _286 _ 11 _ 32 _ 42 _085__ 371 Tom ____________________________38 _ 54 _ 56 _148 _ 98 _ 52 _ 30 _180 _ 328 _ 06 _ 20 _ 52 _078__ 406 RJay ___________________________ 40 _ 40 _ 40 _120 _ 80 _ 94 _ 30 _204_ 324_ 10 _ 20 _ 40 _070__ 394 RodneyS _______________________ 72 _ 60 _ 46 _178 _ 86 _ 20 _ 38 _126 _ 304 _ 13 _ 05 _ 40 _058__ 362 Roger Smith ____________________ 80 _ 76 _ 90_ 246_ 62 _ 04 _ 00 _066 _312_ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000__ 312 wxdude64 ______________________88 _ 62 _ 66 _ 216 _ 86 _ 20 _ 06 _112 _328_ 00 _ 08 _ 76 _084__ 412 ----------------- (highest and lowest forecasts above are color coded; all forecasts are below normal for ORD) __ Persistence ___(Nov 2025)___ 00 _ 16 _ 10 _026 _ 00 _ 60 _ 72_ 132 _158_ 57 _ 59 _ 72 _188 __346 EXTREME FORECASTS as of preliminary scoring ... DCA _ wxdude would win with lowest forecast NYC, BOS _ Roger Smith would win with lowest forecasts ORD _ currently just outside a win-loss outcome (4th lowest forecast high score) ... outcomes below -4.1 would make it a win-loss (RodneyS, wxdude64 win; Roger Smith loss) IAH, DEN, PHX, SEA _ definitely four wins for wxallannj with high forecasts, Mercurial also (as non-regular entrant for IAH). BKViking ties for PHX. ===================== <<< RAW SCORES for DEN and PHX will need converting to max-60, IAH possibly also but adjustments there would be very small anyway >>> Will adjust around end of month and merge with annual scoring ... given the lead Tom had before this month I cannot see how the raw-score to max-60 adjustments can remove enough of his differential to make much difference to what currently looks like Tom maintaining a 150-200 point advantage over nearest rivals. (actual forecasts) FORECASTER __________________ DCA _NYC _BOS __ORD _ATL _IAH ___ DEN _PHX _SEA Mercurial ______________________ +4.0 _+2.0 _+1.0 __-0.5 _+0.5 _+2.0___ -1.0 _ -3.0 _ -1.5 hudsonvalley21 ________________ +1.3 _+1.4 _+1.0 __ -1.6 _+1.7 _ +1.5 ___ +0.4 _+1.8 _-0.3 Scotty Lightning _______________ +1.0 _+1.0 _+0.5 __ -1.0 _+0.5 _+1.0 ___+1.0 _+1.0 _+0.5 ____ Normal ____________________ 0.0 __0.0 __0.0 ____ 0.0 __0.0 __0.0 ____ 0.0 __0.0 __0.0 wxallannj ______________________ -1.0 _ -1.1 __-1.3 ___ -0.7 _+0.8 _+1.7 ___+2.0 _+2.2 _+2.5 DonSutherland1 ________________-1.0 _ -2.0 _-2.0 ___ -3.3 _+2.5 _+1.6 ___+1.4 _+1.1 _ +0.1 BKViking _______________________-1.2 _ -1.3 _ -1.7 ___ -1.7 _+0.9 _+1.2 ___ +1.3 _+2.2 _+1.5 ___ Consensus ________________ -1.3 _ -1.7 _-1.8 ___ -2.8 _+0.7 _ +1.1 ___ +1.0 _+1.5 _+0.5 so_whats_happening __________ -1.4 _ -1.3 _ -1.6 ___ -2.6 _+0.8 _+1.2 ___+1.1 _ +2.1 _ +0.6 Tom ____________________________-1.9 _ -2.7 _-2.8 ___ -3.9 _-0.9 _+0.5 ___+0.6 _+1.5 _+1.1 RJay ___________________________ -2.0 _-2.0 _-2.0 ___ -3.0 _+1.2 _+0.5 ___+1.0 _+1.5 _+0.5 RodneyS _______________________ -3.6 _-3.0 _-2.3 ___ -4.7 _-2.5 _+0.9 ___+1.3 _+0.5 _+0.5 Roger Smith ____________________-4.0 _-3.8 _-4.5 __ -5.9 _ -3.3 _ -1.5 ___-3.6 _ -2.9 _ -2.4 wxdude64 ______________________-4.4 _-3.1 _-3.3 __ -4.7 _ -2.5 _ -0.7 ___-0.9 _+0.8 _+2.3 ----------------- (highest and lowest forecasts above are color coded; all forecasts are below normal for ORD) __ Persistence ___(Nov 2025)___ +0.4 _-0.8 _-0.5 __+1.1 _+3.5 _+5.4 ___+5.7 _+3.9 _+2.1 ===================== 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted 1 hour ago Author Share Posted 1 hour ago (version 2, Dec 2025 scores _ max 60 scoring adjustments) <<< Max 60 applied to IAH, DEN, PHX scores only >>> For contest integrity, eleven regular forecasters are scored 0 to 60 with 11 intervals ... levels can be boosted by as much as 4 to reduce steps to closest approximation to raw score differentials. Mercurial, Normal, Consensus and Persistence scores are then calculated from comparison to the regular-contestant-generated scores. Scores altered by max-60 calculations have this symbol ^ ... scores without the symbol were either higher raw scores or zero scores unchanged. Most IAH scores are not boosted as raw scores were higher than the progression. This could change if IAH anomaly is higher than my projected +4.0F. FORECASTER _____________ DCA_NYC_BOS _ east _ ORD_ATL_IAH _ cent _ c/e_ DEN_PHX_SEA_west_TOT Mercurial ______________________ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000 _ 30 _ 80_ 66^_ 176 _176_ 05^_ 00 _ 00 _005__ 181 hudsonvalley21 ________________ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000 _ 52 _ 96_ 50 _ 198 _198_ 16^_ 46^_ 24 _086__ 284 Scotty Lightning _______________ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000 _ 40 _ 80_ 40_ 160 _160_ 34^_ 22^_ 40 _096__ 256 ____ Normal ____________________00 _ 00 _ 00 _000 _ 20 _ 70_ 20 _ 110 _110__ 16^_ 06^_ 30 _052__ 162 wxallannj ______________________ 20 _ 22 _ 26 _068 _ 34 _ 86_ 60^_180 _248 _ 60^_ 60^_ 80 _200__448 DonSutherland1 ________________20 _ 40 _ 40 _100 _ 86 _ 80_ 54^_220 _320 _ 54^_ 28^_ 32 _114 __ 434 BKViking _______________________24 _ 26 _ 34 _084 _ 54 _ 88_ 44 _186 _270 _ 52^_ 60^_ 60 _172 __ 442 ___ Consensus ________________26 _ 34 _ 36 _ 096 _76 _ 86_ 42 _204 _300_ 34^_ 40^_ 40 _114__414 so_whats_happening __________ 28 _ 26 _ 32 _084 _ 72 _ 86_ 44 _202 _286 _40^_ 52^_ 42 _134__ 420 Tom ____________________________38 _ 54 _ 56 _148 _ 98 _ 52 _ 30 _180 _ 328 _ 22^_ 40^_ 52 _114__ 442 RJay ___________________________ 40 _ 40 _ 40 _120 _ 80 _ 94_ 30 _204_ 324_ 34^_ 40^_ 40 _114__ 438 RodneyS _______________________ 72 _ 60 _ 46 _178 _ 86 _ 20_ 38 _126 _ 304 _ 52^_ 10^_ 40 _102__ 406 Roger Smith ____________________ 80 _ 76 _ 90_ 246_ 62_ 04_ 00 _066 _312 _ 00 _ 00 _ 00 _000__ 312 wxdude64 ______________________88 _ 62 _ 66 _ 216 _ 86 _ 20 _06 _112 _328_ 06^_ 16^_ 76 _098__ 426 ----------------- (highest and lowest forecasts above are color coded; all forecasts are below normal for ORD) __ Persistence ___(Nov 2025)___ 00 _ 16 _ 10 _026 _ 00 _ 60 _78^_ 138 _164_ 80^_ 80^_ 72 _232 __396 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now