Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,018
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

Occasional Thoughts on Climate Change


donsutherland1
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 9/18/2026 at 9:46 PM, LibertyBell said:

These execs who are warning us about it seem like drug addicts to me in a way.  They can't control their own  competitive crapitalistic urges so they want outside regulations to control them. There is talk of putting in a kill switch but the usual opposition to regulations are opposing it.  On top of that there is a whole other side to this, the noise, air and water pollution of data centers that feed AI as well as rising energy costs resulting from them. Entire communities are rising up against them and some states like New York now have data center moratoriums.

The neurophysiologist who partnered up with Sir Roger Penrose is Stuart Hamerhoff. They together created the theory of microtubules as the vehicle of quantum consciousness.

I don't believe either consciousness nor gravity can be quantized either both are emergent properties. But neither can space and time be quantized because they are emergent properties too. Neither black holes nor the big bang were one off singularities. A singularity is just evidence that the theory has broken down on an extreme level. Cyclic theory does away with singularities by replacing gravity with a repulsive force below the level of space time so there is a bounce rather than a bang or a collapse.

By the way that new math you might be looking for is octonion math also known as 8 dimensional math. Relativity was formulated in quaternion or 4 dimensional math but for a unified theory of everything a higher dimensional mathematics is required and it might be octonions.

 

 

 

 

 

I believe that the reality we perceive is the end product of what I call 'synergistic inheritance' 

"plank pixels" exchange information and a byproduct of that interaction ( which takes place at C rate, never more, never less...) creates something near or perhaps substrate to the Quark spectrum ..etc.  the formulation of the fundamental forces of nature takes place in this near infinitesimal scale ... whereby larger and larger constructs emerging and the Quark spectrum.  we recognize (eventually) as energy and matter.

 

 

 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I believe that the reality we perceive is the end product of what I call 'synergistic inheritance' 

"plank pixels" exchange information and a byproduct of that interaction ( which takes place at C rate, never more, never less...) creates something near or perhaps substrate to the Quark spectrum ..etc.  the formulation of the fundamental forces of nature takes place in this near infinitesimal scale ... whereby larger and larger constructs emerging and the Quark spectrum.  we recognize (eventually) as energy and matter.

 

 

 

Quarks fascinated me and have fascinated me ever since I was 12 years old and read Stephen Weinberg's book on them. Did you know Quark stars might exist, they would be an intermediate point between neutron stars and black holes. And aside from holding fractional charges (called color charge because the fractional charges are in Thirds, like additive primary colors RGB that combine to produce white, while their corresponding antiquarks are like subtractive primaries CMY which combine to produce black) something that's amazing in itself, did you know that the gluons which bind them actually increase their force with distance? This seems like a paradox but becomes easier to understand if you view gluons like rubber bands, the farther two bound Quarks get from each other the tighter the rubber band gluons bind them. Another curious fact about quarks is that they are MUCH more massive than the subatomic particles they create. This is because some of the mass of the quark gets converted into binding energy that helps gluons hold them together. The strong nuclear force that helps bind them using gluons reminds me of gravity on a much smaller scale and gluons remind me of gravitons. Combining gravity with the strong nuclear force is analogous to Combining the electromagnetic force with the weak nuclear force (electroweak force) which was done in the late 70s now creating a 2x2 duality that brings us halfway to unifying the four forces!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LibertyBell said:

Quarks fascinated me and have fascinated me ever since I was 12 years old and read Stephen Weinberg's book on them. Did you know Quark stars might exist, they would be an intermediate point between neutron stars and black holes. And aside from holding fractional charges (called color charge because the fractional charges are in Thirds, like additive primary colors RGB that combine to produce white, while their corresponding antiquarks are like subtractive primaries CMY which combine to produce black) something that's amazing in itself, did you know that the gluons which bind them actually increase their force with distance? This seems like a paradox but becomes easier to understand if you view gluons like rubber bands, the farther two bound Quarks get from each other the tighter the rubber band gluons bind them. Another curious fact about quarks is that they are MUCH more massive than the subatomic particles they create. This is because some of the mass of the quark gets converted into binding energy that helps gluons hold them together. The strong nuclear force that helps bind them using gluons reminds me of gravity on a much smaller scale and gluons remind me of gravitons. Combining gravity with the strong nuclear force is analogous to Combining the electromagnetic force with the weak nuclear force (electroweak force) which was done in the late 70s now creating a 2x2 duality that brings us halfway to unifying the four forces!

 

It seems unification has taken a backseat to 'quantum gravity'. 

It may be that in efforts to unify the 4 forces ...they keep running into a mathematical wall they can't get over because they've slaved the logic to (inevitably) needing to Quantize gravity - which I wonder if that can be done.

But again, I don't believe that is possible in 'this' universe.  Paraphrasing before ... gravity may have a field equation/origin that is different from its force - 'why' the force emerges.  My conjecture is a Plank scale "pixerlarium" flow of information density.  Analogous to how electrical flow produces a corresponding magnetic field - as an oddly useful analog.  The former form ... it's not electrons, however. It's "bytes" of "god code"  Only the gravity field is a monopole ... whereas magnetic monopoles have not yet been conclusively observed in nature. 

One creepy idea I was dancing with is that it is dipolar but the other side is "on the other side"

It's kind of like starting out with a goal that would eventually require quantum gravity.  Why not? every metric in physical math is quantum or can be quantized.   But, my conjecture is that Einsteinian/GTR  emerges out of Quantum Mechanics - trying to reconcile the math in either direction would then become a universal, improper epistemic direction. 

Another way to describe "synergistic heredity" is a "grand projector theory" 

Imagine the analog, a reel-to-reel cinema machine humming away...  The gears inside are the plank mechanics, the lens is the quantum mechanical 'event horizon' and the the screen is the result.  Machine --> Lens --> Reality.  We are the far right.  GTR is the mathematics of the far right result.  Not the source.   I don't believe Quantum Mechanics is the source, either.  Again, the pixelarium is where the discussion begins in this holistic idea.

Hint hint... a black hole event horizon is a boundary in which the complete reality wave function collapses - reality as we know it suffers decomposition at that boundary ... perhaps a distorted sort of "primordial" version.  The "object" lurking inside is pure Plank information - if the information slows below the pixel-to-pixel 'communication' rate of one C, all heredity ceases.  No reality. Not as we know it.

There is no state of no pixels.  The entire physical volume of the cosmos is pixels. There is no 'space in between' in that sense.  More over, the most fundamental/rudimentary information level is 0 point energy.  The information has a fixed transmission rater of one C at 0 point energy. Otherwise known as the vacuum energy density.  10¹⁹ KeV    A pixel is equivalent to a Plank unit .. roughly 10⁻³⁵ m

As we add information - the drag is gravity ;)   but what is it dragging against? the expansion of the cosmos.

 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...