Jump to content

Sydney Claridge

Members
  • Posts

    500
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sydney Claridge

  1. Definitely noticed a few models potentially showing a tornado threat for southeastern Ohio (today's 09z RAP, the last few NAM3K runs), and perhaps into central Ohio (especially in the last few NAM runs) as well, that is if some isolated storms can get going. These models show some high EHI values in these areas (and the 12z NAM3K extends high EHI into western PA as well). GFS is much more bearish though. Would like to see some more model consistency, but over the last day or so the models suggesting a potential tornado threat do seem to have reduced the amount of forecasted VBV in the Upper Ohio Valley region.
  2. That said, most of the San Antonio metro area is north of the "main city" and the northern suburbs are well-populated. It looks like this storm could be moving towards some of the suburban areas of the SA metro area. I'm starting to get a little concerned for the areas near and along north/northwest Loop 1604 if this thing can hold together, especially if the rotation starts to tighten up.
  3. Definitely an interesting solution. I was wondering if this is a bit of an outlier solution though (however the 09z RAP is bringing mid-60s dewpoints into DFW), but the NAM also seems further south than the other models by comparison... 6z GFS (and 6z GFS-FV3) is somewhat between that HRRR run and and the 6z NAM with respect to warm front placement.
  4. Tonight's 0z NAM and ECMWF are trying to bring mid-60s dewpoints into Ohio for Sunday, though the NAM shows some VBV issues (I don't have access to ECMWF upper-level winds). SPC has a broad ENH risk from GA/AL all the way up to southern Ohio (just south of KCMH). The NAM and ECMWF bring this warm sector further north than the ENH risk, up to at least Mansfield or so (around the north end of the Slight risk or so), and ECMWF gets 60-degree dewpoints as far north as Cleveland. Would expect to see the ENH moved north (to include Dayton and especially Columbus) if NAM and/or ECMWF verify. SPC says damaging winds are the primary threat, though they predict tornadoes will be possible near and west of the Appalachians. I'm slightly skeptical with the VBV issues (and with the GFS being less aggressive into the OH/KY/WV area), but we'll see what happens. This would be with the same system responsible for tomorrow's severe in east Texas and LA/AR (and that is where the bulk of the tornado threat with this system will likely be). The 6z NAM run is a little less aggressive in the Ohio area I would say, with slightly lower dewpoints and lower temperatures, and less EHI present.
  5. I'm in DFW and I'm glad to see that the NAM and GFS models are not putting me in the warm sector here. That said, the warm front will likely be fairly close to DFW (especially if the GFS verifies), though the best helicity will be off to the east by the time that happens (the helicity seems to be in place with the NAM though, and today's 18z NAM run seems to be moving the warm front ominously close to if not on top of parts of DFW). If this storm system winds up northwest of where the models are depicting it for some reason, then I might be a bit more concerned where I am at.
  6. The GFS-based models (GFS and GFS-FV3) are placing the warm front with the Saturday system just south of DFW on the 0z runs. Those models do seem to have moved the front's location slightly further north with each of the last few runs. The 0z runs puts DFW in the upper-50s for dewpoints with mid-to-upper 60s dewpoints just to the south and SE. It will be interesting to see how far north the warm front can come, as well as what the NAM has to say about it as it comes into range.
  7. I'm surprised SPC went with a severe thunderstorm watch in OH/SE IN/KY rather than a tornado watch, given all of the helicity in place.
  8. And just like that the tornado warning west of Dayton is cancelled. That said, the supercell about to move into the Cincinnati metro area looks pretty powerful compared to the other storms on the radar. It is severe-warned for 70 mph wind gusts and half-dollar size hail. EDIT: it is now tornado-warned too. EDIT 2: it seems like a tight rotation is trying to move into Florence, KY per WLWT livestream. It seems like it wants to follow the I-71 corridor, so if it can hold together that long then even Columbus might be in its path later on as well.
  9. I'm wondering a bit more about that supercell that is now midway between Louisville and Cincinnati (the one following the Ohio River), near Madison, IN. No tornado warning on it but it looks pretty potent on radar (at least in terms of the colors being displayed). And just as I type this, a tornado warning goes up for another cell just west of Dayton, OH.
  10. I've been thinking the same thing all day as well. RAP is bringing the best EHI from the current storms in KY/IN all the way up to north-central Ohio; HRRR keeps the highest EHI values west of CMH. Not going to rule out tornadoes near CMH though (SPC has a 5%-10% in the area for a reason). This is very much a now-casting situation.
  11. Eagerly anticipating the 1630Z SPC convective outlook. Some changes are bound to be made, especially for central and NE IL, plus NW IN, given the storms in that area. Not to mention that clearing along the Ohio River is bound to introduce some issues down the line for Louisville and Cincinnati as well.
  12. I had been wondering about the storms over central IL as well. There's plenty of sunshine to get things destabilized there, and its fairly close to the low pressure system too.
  13. I find it interesting that multiple runs of the HRRR and RAP want to destabilize an area of Ohio (mainly western and central parts of the state) well ahead of the broken line of storms we are currently seeing around Paducah. If one of those models verifies, EHI values may be fairly high in that area. If SPC does decide to add in a hatched area for significant tornadoes, I'm going to be placing my bets on western and central Ohio (and perhaps eastern Indiana too) given what these models are showing, especially if storms can tap into that energy (though the modeled EHI values seem to drop as the broken line approaches). Basically what these models are showing is a broader area of instability into Ohio compared to the relatively narrow instability axis we are currently seeing.
  14. The current RAP runs (11z) seem the most aggressive at the present moment, especially with respect to western and central OH. Would not be surprised to see tornadoes (perhaps strong tornadoes?) if that RAP solution verifies. Other models (like the NAM3k and HRRR) bring in less instability, so more conservatively I would not expect significant tornadoes either. SPC's new outlook (still ENH, 10% tornado/30% wind as far east as Columbus, OH) says that if stronger instability can develop then they might have to introduce a significant tornado risk.
  15. 18z HRRR shows no lack of warmth ahead of the front. There's a lot of SRH shown over the warm sector and mid-60s to lower-70s temperatures with dewpoints modeled in the upper 50s to lower 60s across western and central Ohio. If storm mode can remain discrete (and sufficient cloud breaks occur as previously mentioned) it seems that the potential for tornadoes is there. Looks promising provided that everything comes together just right. That said, the NAM3K is a bit less aggressive with destabilization. I know the HRRR can be a bit overdone at times, though. It is also showing pockets of high temperatures in the lower 80s over western WV, SW PA, and SE OH, though this area is not under the moist axis (temperatures under the moist axis are generally being modeled in the 60s to near 70 at best). The HRW models and the NAM 3k (the other CAM models available on pivotalweather.com) are at least somewhat consistent on a temperature spike into at least the mid-70s occurring over this region, though.
  16. There was a 75 mph wind gust reported at Fort Worth NAS JRB per the storm reports on SPC's website. I'm close to that area and didn't get any sort of strong wind gusts at my location to my understanding. EDIT: updated severe thunderstorm warning for Dallas County mentioning 80 mph wind gusts as a possibility. Hearing reports of power outages in various areas of DFW over Facebook. Expecting to hear reports of storm damage filter in across the DFW area over the next few hours especially once daylight comes along.
  17. Severe thunderstorm warning now up for much of Tarrant County, including Fort Worth. NWS saying hail up to half-dollar size is possible.
  18. Still thinking about those storms east of Abilene. They look to be currently in an area where they would stay elevated, but it seems that per the SPC Mesoanalysis they could be moving into an area with some surface-based instability. I'm wondering if they are about to intensify and become severe, especially if they can become surface-based. These are fast-movers (forward speeds of 60+ mph in places) per the significant weather advisories so we should find out soon. EDIT: and SPC has just put up a new mesoscale discussion saying that a watch is likely from west of DFW into SE OK, SW AR, and NW LA. It suggests that the storms might stay elevated in the western part of the MD area, but may become surface-based later on.
  19. Yep, looks like some heavy storms (one of which looks like a hail producer) have quickly gone up around Abilene.
  20. 7z HRRR is trying to bring a huge supercell across the DFW area at 12z this morning, and the 6z run shows what appears to be some fairly potent storms entering DFW at 11z. Since the 5z HRRR run that model has been ramping up the threat for DFW in particular it seems. There is plenty of surface-based instability around (around 1500 J/kg) so I guess there is always the chance that something could go surface-based, but I hope the storms do stay elevated for obvious reasons if they even try to get as intense as the HRRR runs are showing.
  21. Wow. There's very little (if any) instability there, so it looks like a line of showers with severe wind gusts. There must be strong winds just above the surface or something... I'm not sure, but I believe that's a sign of fairly dynamic storm system. EDIT: It seems like SPC Mesoanalysis is showing around 250 J/kg of MLCAPE there.
  22. And it looks like an area of storms which formed well to the west of DFW are falling apart near Graham and Jacksboro.
  23. I'm now getting a bit more intrigued about the storms that should take place overnight from tonight into tomorrow morning. SPC put up a risk for significant hail (15% hatched) from the DFW Metroplex to the I-40 corridor in eastern Oklahoma, and a 5% tornado risk NE of DFW. Models are showing significant VBV for DFW/North Texas in particular, though. But it seems that the tornado risk should be highest tomorrow (3/8) over the Mississippi Valley in the Mid-South region per SPC's issuance of a Day 2 Enhanced risk there (in the "maximum risk by hazard" section of their Day 2 write-up SPC is preliminarily going with 10% hatched).
  24. That's for the 3/12 system based on the timestamps that I see. I had thought that one had looked a bit more like a squall line based on the GFS models I had been looking at anyways. What do you think of the 3/9 system?
  25. GFS and the GFS-FV3 seems to bring a front with storms through the DFW area early-to-mid morning, whereas the Euro seems to be slowing that front down a bit (bringing it through DFW around noon). For my location, it would be interesting to see if the other models trend to slowing down the front as the event draws closer. Still a few days out so we'll have to see, but currently it sounds like this would be more of a concern for east Texas than for DFW. EDIT: though not for this timeframe, it is also interesting to see the GFS and Euro show another storm system next Tuesday as well. I'm wondering if we are about to move into a pattern that is much more conducive for severe thunderstorms (and not just because of the change in seasons).
×
×
  • Create New...