Jump to content

JC-CT

Members
  • Posts

    18,191
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JC-CT

  1. if the rapid deepening happens up here at our latitude, it should be fine. but yeah, nobody wants a storm that is already occluded before it gets here
  2. this is all true. also why some of these deep ensemble members showing up haven't actually been that great region-wide. But there is something historic about a storm that strong that is cool in its own right.
  3. If you were a model developer, you would want the model to account for that bias. Please let me live in my fantasy world where perfect is good.
  4. If we are being honest with ourselves and said, if we were model developers, what would we want an ensemble mean to look like at 132 hours for a storm that verifies over or just inside the benchmark...that has to be pretty close to it.
  5. Yeah, qpf increasing each run is expected with ensemble means this far out because its slowly dropping off members that are way off the grid, plus just that it's still 5 away days. I thought the 0z mean didnt look bad either. There are more west members at 6z though.
  6. Question for you - do you know if stormvistas snow total mean is a mean of the member snow totals, or more like running the snow algorithm on the mean?
×
×
  • Create New...