wolfie09

One witness after another lol

Trumps lawyers won't even bring that conspiracy to court lol The lawyers won't even call it fraud!!

Trump supporter is getting lit into haha She thinks her ballot didn't count because of what"attorneys" told her and outside noise.. That's a trump witness lmao

It's a call in by phone.. 866-952-8437 Code 753-804-125# Not sure how long it will last, it's only about sharpiegate anyway lol

You can call in and hear the court proceedings, I'm listening to the Arizona case as I type..It's nice to hear people that actually know what they are talking about it lol

Trump lost another lawsuit, this time vs CNN lol 13th straight loss post election..

A Trump campaign attorney conceded in court on Thursday morning that he tried to enter hundreds of dodgy form-filed affidavits into evidence, even though their own investigation found that a subset of the sworn statements that they received were filled with lies and “spam.” “This is concerning,” Judge Daniel Kiley, from Arizona’s Maricopa County, remarked with some understatement. “How is that a reliable process of gathering evidence?” the judge asked, later blocking admission of the so-called evidence.

If It was true he would of won at least 1 case lol Soon the courts will stop these frivolous lawsuits..

So basically trump should of won all the votes at the polls and mail-in? Got it lol I guess the election project was lying as well when they showed nearly 70% of mail-in ballots going to the democratic party, out of 2.5 million votes..

They must still be rigging the election lol

I bet they are all Republicans too Just like the usps employee, the lady who had her ballot sent in by someone else, the child molester poll worker as a witness..If they had all this evidence they would of won at least 1 case lol Why wouldn't these people come forward once they noticed these irregularities?

Brnovich said the idea of significant fraud in Arizona is undercut by the fact that in many cases voters "split their ticket." "People voted for Republicans down ballot, but they didn't vote for President Trump, [or for incumbent GOP Sen.] Martha McSally ... that's the reality," Brnovich said.

Borat set him up lol I'm not sure if he knew she was 15 but that's the age she plays in the movie (she's really 24)..

I guess he fits right in with the poll watcher

Ever see the clip of Rudy on borat 2?

Without a penalty the ACA isn't hurting anyone..

Sweeping Law Republicans are banking on the Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority, including new Justice Amy Coney Barrett and fellow Trump appointees Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch. The Trump-appointed justices suggested they were inclined to invalidate the mandate now that it no longer carries a tax penalty. Gorsuch said Roberts’s 2012 opinion was premised on the notion that the tax penalty would produce revenue. “That seems to have withered away,” Gorsuch said. In a separate part of the 2012 opinion, Roberts said the mandate couldn’t be justified as an exercise of Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce. Barrett questioned California Solicitor General Michael Mongan’s contention that the mandate is now an “inoperative provision” that doesn’t bind anyone. “You are asking us to treat it as if it functionally has been repealed, but that’s not what Congress did,” Barrett said. “Does that matter?”

Two key U.S. Supreme Court justices indicated they are inclined to uphold the bulk of the Affordable Care Act as the court weighed the fate of a landmark law that provides health-insurance to 20 million people. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh both suggested during oral arguments Tuesday that they won’t vote to strike down the entire law even if the court invalidates a provision that requires people to acquire insurance. A key question is whether the court would “sever” that so-called individual mandate so that the rest of the law remains intact. “I tend to agree with you that it’s a very straightforward case for severability under our precedents, meaning that we would excise the mandate and leave the rest of the act in place,” Kavanaugh told a lawyer defending the law on behalf of the House of Representatives. President Donald Trump’s administration is joining Republican-led states in challenging the law, known as Obamacare, which the GOP has been trying to wipe out since it was enacted in 2010. The mandate originally carried a tax penalty for noncompliance, a provision that was central to a 2012 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the law. A Republican-controlled Congress zeroed-out the tax in 2017, and opponents now say the whole ACA must be invalidated. Roberts, who wrote the 2012 ruling, signaled he disagreed. “I think it’s hard for you to argue that Congress intended the entire act to fall if the mandate were struck down when the same Congress that lowered the penalty to zero did not even try to repeal the rest of the act,” Roberts said. Read More: Obamacare Stakes Rise at High Court as Election Dooms Easy Fix With health care accounting for a sixth of the U.S. economy, the stakes are massive. Advocates for patients, doctors, hospitals and insurance companies are urging the court to uphold the law, warning of chaos should the measure be invalidated in the midst of a pandemic. A ruling is likely by June. The ACA, signed into law by President Barack Obama, expanded the Medicaid program for the poor, provided consumers with subsidies, created marketplaces to shop for insurance policies, required insurers to cover people with pre-existing conditions, and let children stay on their parents’ policies until age 26.

Arizona(recount) For races with more than 25,000 ballots — like the presidential contest — the candidates have to be separated by just 200 or fewer votes.