Jump to content

ncforecaster89

Members
  • Posts

    1,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About ncforecaster89

  • Birthday 05/03/1970

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    KILM
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Wilmington, NC
  • Interests
    Hurricanes and blizzards are my primary interests relative to a specific atmospheric phenomenon. Tropical meteorology was, and has been, my focus since my first hurricane experience at the impressionable age of 14. It was this fateful encounter that led me to pursue a degree in atmospheric sciences. While in college, I was most fortunate to have interned at the NHC (by way of a student internship) with the late Bob Case as a mentor. Although I no longer work in the meterological field professionally, I still enjoy helping others by sharing the knowledge others have so generously given me. Thus, one is most likely to see the vast majority of my posts being centered on tropical meterology.

Recent Profile Visitors

6,305 profile views
  1. Here’s the data corresponding to the only two locations whereby I personally compiled top 10 lists a couple of years ago for this general area: Philadelphia, PA: 1) 31.0” Jan. 6-8, 1996 2) 28.5” Feb. 5-6, 2010 3) 23.2” Dec. 19-20, 2009 4) 22.4” Jan. 23-24, 2016 5) 21.3” Feb. 11-12, 1983 6) 21.0” Dec. 25-26, 1909 7) 19.4” April 3-4, 1915 8. 18.9” Feb. 12-14, 1899 9. 18.7” Feb. 16-17, 2003 10. 16.7” Jan. 22-24, 1935 New Brunswick, NJ: 26.9 inches January 2016 22.6 inches January 1996 20.9 inches Feb 2003 20.8 inches Feb 1961 20.7 inches Feb 2006 20 inches Feb 1899 19.5 inches December 1947 19.5 inches Feb 2010 18.5 inches Dec 1948 17.9 inches Feb 1983 17.0 inches Jan 2011
  2. I’ll add that I’m posting in this particular sub forum because I’m considering a chase to your specific area, depending on how things evolve over the next 12-24 hours.
  3. I have no idea who “hurricane” happens to be, but I’m not surprised that they are “hugging the EURO”—as it’s the main fall-back approach for most forecasters. That’s not meant to be demeaning, but rather a reflection of the general consensus due to the EURO’s general superior 500 mb scores. That said, there’s still an ample amount of time for relatively significant synoptic changes to materialize that could change the current model consensus considerably. Right now, a blended approach amongst the Euro/UKMET/GFS/CMC/NAM would be best, in my opinion—which doesn’t simply place the latest Euro solution above all others.
  4. Hope everyone is, and has been, doing well. Just finished a short write-up on this 11th anniversary of the 2015 Valentine’s Day Blizzard—last of the four major SNE snowstorms that buried the region. https://x.com/tbrite89/status/2022830263093395652
  5. It was simply the result of deformation banding setting up directly over that area.
  6. Here’s a look back at this truly historic and unprecedented event for the Tar Heel State (NC): https://x.com/tbrite89/status/2019523144395157791
  7. The mesoscale (short range) models are the primary source at this point. However, the globals still have value in helping determining the track of the coastal low.
  8. It’s a direct consequence of the more eastward track and finding ourselves in the strong subsidence zone, while the more inland areas are in the deformation zone. There’s always going to be winners and losers in these type of setups…with a coastal low that’s bombing. In this particular run/solution, we are the undisputed losers. But like Josh noted, it’s still too early to pinpoint the precise location of these dynamics.
  9. You’re correct in that the NAM is more prone to exaggerated dry slots than the globals (such as the ECMWF and GFS). Even so, the physics still apply and is a definite cause for concern. It was also seen on the 18Z ECMWF, as well. In both cases, the dry slot was directly over my house!
  10. In simplest terms, it’s the result of the coastal low tracking farther offshore as it’s undergoing bombogenesis…where the deformation zone is positioned more to the north/northeast, favoring central/eastern NC and SE VA with high totals (10-20+ inches along the coast and inland). However, this setup allows dry mid/upper-level air to wrap cyclonically around the low's southwestern/southern flank from the southwest, creating a pronounced dry slot that intrudes into SE NC. The worst part of this particular scenario is that the dry air wraps in during the peak precip phase, leading to an abrupt transition from heavy bands (e.g., near New Bern/Kitty Hawk) to much lower/no accumulations in Wilmington and other SE coastal zones. That said, this is a common feature in these explosive coastal setups, especially when the low stays a bit farther east, as shown in that 06Z 12km NAM run.
  11. How does this work for everyone? Edit: see I was late posting the map on the previous page.
  12. My previous post is gone, so I took the time to provide a new update: https://x.com/tbrite89/status/2017152042779689147
  13. For those who might be interested, here’s my latest projections for 25 select locations along the east coast: https://x.com/tbrite89/status/2017125164824100896
×
×
  • Create New...