Jump to content

nwohweather

Members
  • Posts

    3,553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nwohweather

  1. 36 minutes ago, Ottawa Blizzard said:

    People have short memories when it comes to weather. In late January 2019, my area of Toronto received over a foot of snow.

    Right? One of the best snowstorms of my life, for all intents and purposes it was a blizzard. Strong winds, 6-12" across NW Ohio and roads closed for 36 hours. Saturday snowstorm, and the roads were not drivable until Tuesday really

    • Like 1
  2. don't disagree with the sharp gradient on the NW edge;"LOWER CONFIDENCE IN FAR NORTH/NORTHWEST CWA WHERE LESS   
    FAVORABLE SYNOPTIC EVOLUTION COULD YIELD AFOREMENTIONED SHARPER   
    CUT-OFF IN PRECIP SHIELD.," as LOT alludes too. But fairly solid 3-5" totals thorugh a good chunk of the metro. Ratio's should help. Areas south and east may get the bonus qpf, but with lower ratios. 
     
    EQfhJyCWoAA-Vhv.thumb.jpeg.d13cb9ad18ce37b258a31fcb1d220b09.jpeg


    Just beautiful. To be fair I’m moving to Charleston in a month so I’m owed a solid snowstorm haha
    • Like 1
  3. 1 minute ago, RCNYILWX said:

    17:1 is likely too high as an average but 10:1 is too low, probably near or slightly above climo average is the way to go. So let's say an average of 13 or 14 to 1.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     

    The DGZ seems so shallow with this system though I can't see it being too much higher than 10:1. 13:1 is probably correct

  4. Just now, Baum said:

    Nice head fake today. Can't say had concerns after the earlier 12Z GFS and NAM runs. Always get a chuckle at how these models can flip so quickly from one run to the next even as we close in on an event. In the past 36 hrs went from a non event to a moderate event with even greater potential to a nuisance snow. Just a bad year if your a snow lover...carry on....

    The Euro never was showing it so you should consider basing forecasts among a blend of guidance and not just a couple. This by no means should be shocking

    • Confused 3
    • Weenie 1
  5. 5 hours ago, Snowstorms said:

    2011-12, 2012-13 and 2015-16 were worse up until now. 

     

    2011-12 was a lovely winter in my opinion. It does stink when the snowmobile and ice skates stay in the garage but the weather was beautiful and sunny which was a nice reprieve considering what was on the horizon.

    I think 2013-14 was honestly overwhelming, the constant snow and cold just wore you down.  I do like snow, but 86" was too much for me

    • Like 2
  6. 51 minutes ago, IWXwx said:

    The 06z GFS was showing something similar, but I don't have a clue.

    EDIT: My bad, that's the 12z

    Screenshot_2020-01-14 Models GFS — Pivotal Weather.png

    I believe it is due to the abnormally dry air off to the east of the low. Typically the cold conveyor belt moistens as it flows under the warm conveyor belt when wrapping around a storm and dries off a bit turning into snow on the backend of a low. This is honestly a perfect CAD example as you can see how as this moves east it drops freezing rain/sleet all over the Apps

  7. 1 minute ago, CoalCityWxMan said:

    :raining: spring can’t come soon enough at this point 

    It isn't here yet? Honestly one of the more mild winters I've seen temperature wise. Would not be shocked at all to see this be a backloaded winter though, it has all the hallmarks of that happening

    • Like 1
  8. 5 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

    However, the preceding storm system is not strong and there is some ridging ahead of this storm system.

    Yeah I guess there is that baby low sweeping through tomorrow. Regardless of accumulations, that is one heck of a shot of freezing rain/sleet that goes through Northern IL/IN/OH on the Euro Friday night-Saturday morning. That alone is enough to cause significant travel impacts

     
  9. 42 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

    GFS definitely trended back south with surface low vs 00z and 06z runs. If the GEFS and rest of the guidance doesn't jump NW, would think that trend will continue.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
     

    It wouldn't shock me if this does trend south, typically in a loaded pattern your rule of thumb is storms keep going south of previous ones. Not always correct, but typically your cold is entrenched enough to kind of guide the low. 

    If anything I don't like the dry air off to the east. It could eat into some snow totals a bit

    • Like 1
  10. 15 minutes ago, Snowstorms said:

    I mean qpf can always be over or under modeled. We won't know until within 24 hrs.

    But if you look at the 250mb wind map you'd see some subtropical influence and the PWAT maps indicate a good amount of moisture. It's a decent Colorado Low. 

    Well I'm going less on models, and more on actuality here. It may be a Colorado Low with a solid gulf stream of moisture, but there are three streams at play as always which can make a big difference on different sectors of the storm

  11. 3 minutes ago, Snowstorms said:

    The HP placement is different than the last storm. We had to much WAA thanks to the strong SE ridge. It's a bit more suppressed with this event. 

    As I said earlier it is kind of weird to have such a strong high immediately to the Northeast instead of back to the west. What I do wonder with two of the three conveyor belts being drier air do you guys think it will lead to a colder and drier storm than is currently being modeled? My thoughts are that QPF is going to drop or be less than what is expected because of this

×
×
  • Create New...