Jump to content

Ji

Members
  • Posts

    23,150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ji

  1. yea consistent to me is usesless in modeling becuase in one run---it could do a wild swing and the consistency meant nothing. usually outliers like the RGEM or NAM wont probaby work
  2. yea...i can handle going from 34 to 26 for the most part
  3. we got Named by the RGEM but does this model have wild swings typically within 48?
  4. are you sure you werent checking maps on your break? you have come back in mid season form---as opposed to training camp
  5. unfortunately...your dreams will probably crash and burn....id rather it not run till 00z
  6. wow we all waited days to get in NAM range to get NAM'D.....and looked what happens
  7. Whats your with all the pink over Loudoun lol
  8. well you are in skanksville...you have a better chance
  9. that looks like the RGEM. is that RGEM or GGEM?
  10. no dice on the para--still too north for us
  11. the PARA looks interesting if it could just pass the 42 hour frame
  12. maybe its lack of high resolution? It has healthy snow through 12z Tuesday but not heavy but it did take a step towards the RGEM in terms of features
  13. im not seeing any improvement on GFS so far
  14. it actually seem to start at 6z on the euro
  15. i think the icon would of shown a similar arount...there was a panel in there where it would been like 2-3 inch snow rates that was Green instead of Blue
  16. just seeing the RGEM Map was worth about 5 inches in real snow to me
  17. most would be happy with WSW criteria though so the extra 21 inches is just gravy
  18. if this is actually snow on the icon and not rain...............
×
×
  • Create New...