In all honesty, we've seen this movie too many times. The Pacific is going to likely wreck shop indefinitely. I don't see this winter as having great potential. A PAC behaving like a hyperactive hamster on a wheel has proven this time and again.
Hope I'm wrong.
I mean, clearly the data that was shown is tangible and objective.
There are probably times in life when the recorded data can allow someone to not just "stick with it" because that's what they heard. But you do you.
I literally posted a video of that day (February 16, 2013) in the Sanitorium thread, and what happens if you're under a meso band. Went from 43 degrees to 31 in a matter of minutes with heavy snow. It was textbook.
@olafminesaw Speaking of Feb 2013...
The discussion of a meso low in the storm thread brings to mind something I love to look back on occasionally.
Back in February 2013, Widremann perfectly called a meso for my location. What started with thunder and 43 degrees escalated quickly. Someone could get a nice surprise this weekend if they're under a meso band.
The OT format for the NFL is long past the need for revising.
Too huge of an advantage for the coin toss winner. Chiefs/Bills was literally determined by a coin toss.
This might be a rare case in which the emphatic statement is probably true.
I think most people on this board would agree - ice progs just don't usually pan out in reality. That should be good news.
I wasn't watching when this was posted on air, but surely it was meant to demonstrate the difficulty in forecasting due to such model disagreement, no?