CoastalWx
-
Posts
168,955 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by CoastalWx
-
Terrible. Hopefully we can get something to cover the ground with this airmass. I’m assuming by Saturday it will get ugly in terms of cover.
-
Just keep drinking
-
Chinese stars thrown at them during commercials if they talk negative?
-
60 Saturday.
-
It will torch.
-
In the 11-15 day. Sort of overrunning look.
-
We NAM?
-
Actually EPS and GEFS aren't far off at 12z.
-
LOL, the Dale Arnold's of SNE Wx. Even they go quiet.
-
Flaccid 12z runs.
-
GEFS still want a more wintry look with split flow and overrunning.
-
He said that?
-
Disappointing, but oh well.
-
ORH still got 2' and NE Mass over 24-30". . But eastern CT did not do that well.
-
Well I definitely agree it did not encompass a lot of geographical area for sure.
-
Needs work. Although the fronto band stuff could happen over the interior. I do feel like it wouldn't take much to get something like the ICON. Not writing it off yet around here, but I'm also not all in.
-
It's close to becoming a longer duration (albeit maybe not heavy) event for the coast.
-
I feel like if it did not hit someone's backyard...it seems to get downplayed. If aerial coverage is weighed in, sure. But saying something "in the least plausible way" insinuates something limped into that category. I don't see how you can say that?
-
Hit the Berks hard though.
-
So we should downplay Jan 2005 too I guess.
-
Tip downplayed that too. LOL.
-
I don't understand least plausible.
-
That will be memorable. 40-60mph winds and hours in a deformation band? That won't happen again like that.
-
No that one likely may be a one timer in terms of impacts and what it did. It's up there with '78. But I will say, that ( two weeks ago) was probably the harshest conditions I have seen for so many hours.
-
A blizzard is defined by metrics, not aerial coverage, so I don't agree with Tip. Maybe he worded it wrong.
