Jump to content

Lava Rock

Members
  • Posts

    11,654
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lava Rock

  1. 28F. At least it looks and feels like winter. Back to bare ground by Mon.
  2. No one week delay like usual? Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  3. I'll be in LA for Xmas. Probably be colder there.
  4. oh yeah, after a couple trys, once the collar locked, I was good. New to shaft driven blower = rookie mistake
  5. I forgot to lock in my PTO for the blower and it kept kicking off. I was like wtf, is going on then realized I had forgotten to make sure the coupler was fully attached to the shaft.
  6. 5.5" best I could measure Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  7. 0.25" Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  8. Hasn't been snowing last 2hr Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  9. Gonna have to pound to get 7". Maybe 1/8" so far Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  10. Pats are pathetically bad Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  11. 32.5/32 sn Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  12. 34/33. Spitting sn Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  13. Roll up sled was my preference Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  14. It's very early. Take a run in a.m. , clear your head and be ready for the next model run Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  15. Cheese with that beer? Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  16. how about them pinecones this year, they're everywhere
  17. 52.3F. So much for getting some frost in the ground
  18. Local Mets don't seem very excited Sent from my SM-G981U1 using Tapatalk
  19. we ski at sunday river and I don't know why they don't install more cams. It's ridiculous they only have one cam facing the chondola from the northpeak lodge. They used to have another at bottom of Southridge (at foggy goggle) but it's been gone for awhile. What's the thinking on limiting cams on the mtn?
  20. yea, she was harsh, but my thumb was more sore holding the throttle open on those 40 carbs
  21. maybe I didn't ask the right question. if the models were worse, were mets better at making more accurate frcsts with what they had? the other thing i'm not considering which speaks to your 2nd point is that in the "old" days (1990-2015) models didn't pick up on storms way out there (right?) and mets were working within a storm range of say 96hr, so those storms, if they panned out would make it seem the frcsts were better back then. it just seems we've spoiled ourselves with models that extend beyond 300hr, so one can get a lot of disappointment if what they're tracking doesn't work out. maybe i'm just babling, but was trying to make more sense of it to a weather weenie like me
×
×
  • Create New...