Jump to content

BuffaloWeather

Members
  • Posts

    25,686
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BuffaloWeather

  1. Taking the blend of models into account I feel like we're all in a pretty good spot. I'd still stick with GFS/EURO compromise. Wouldn't worry about the high res models until tomorrow night/Weds.
  2. Love the conveyor belt look on NAM. Burries the midwest and extrapolated out this way would be a huge hit for all
  3. I actually don't mind it for the big dogs. But I don't like it for every storm. They've been naming hurricanes and tropical storms for years.
  4. Those ice maps are never accurate, better to use satellite imagery. The far southtowns of Buffalo received over 3 feet of snow from an event in which the lake was 85% covered last year. So lake effect potential is definitely still there. Can get evaporation between the cracks in the ice.
  5. Its the sleet/snow algorithm on pivotal vs tidbits. Pivotal has higher detail.
  6. agreed thinking 1:14 further NW and right along that edge 1:10.
  7. I'm dumbfounded too. The only comparable years are 1966-1969. You should feel good that this won't last. You got all the bad years out of the way now. Statistics don't lie. https://www.tsforecast.com/seasonalsnowfall.html
  8. Yep. I don't see that changing though. McDermott made idiot calls all season long. He one time declined a 5 yd penalty that would have made it a 52 yrd fg vs 47 for no reason. That Jags game was all coaching. He could have put Bates in at O line which solved all our O line issues earlier. He is so stubborn in keeping "his" guys in. We had a really rough patch mid year on our O line and to think it was easily solvable.
  9. Nam is always amped it had the last storm 100 miles nw then what actually happened
×
×
  • Create New...